Date August 24, 2007
Section(s) Letters
The Brunswick News
Thank you for running Sen. Jeff Chapman's remarks about what is happening on Jekyll Island.
It is appreciated to read news about the environment being protected by our elected officials in the newspaper.
Jekyll is a special place that was in 1950 created by the state for the benefit of average Georgians. The Jekyll Island Authority members seem to have lost sight of this when they approved a developer who would create a large facility with a $250 nightly rental.
The authority, to my knowledge, never refuted the published remarks "rent rebate" and "sweetheart deal." Affordability is a very real issue on Jekyll.
Hopefully on Aug. 30 the Senate-House Oversight Committee will reconsider the approval of this developer's proposal for the rebuilding of the Buccaneer with rates most Georgians will not be able to afford.
Thank you again for publishing all the news. The coastal area is very fragil and needs protectors who will step up and speak about preserving the environment.
Connie and William Brillhart
St. Simons Island
What are the real motives here, Mr. Keen?
In an article on the front page of the Aug. 20 edition of The Brunswick News, state Rep. Jerry Keen reported that Republicans will allay our concerns about new development by abolishing property taxes.
The article states that the elimination of school, county and city property taxes would be like throwing cold water on developments that require controversial actions by government.
Mr. Keen adds, "If there is no money, they will take a second look."
How will this stop development? It would seem to me that it would encourage more development.
Later in the article, Mr. Keen explains that government services such as schools, police, firemen, etc., would be paid for by state sales tax.
This could necessitate adding sales tax to purchases of medicine and groceries and even on services rendered such as doctor services.
What Keen failed to say is how much these state sales taxes would have to be increased to pay for these services. There have been suggestions that the state sales tax would need to be increased to 23 percent.
All the sales tax would go to Atlanta, then some come back to the county. I am not sure 23 percent would be enough.
Another paragraph in The News article states that the amount of sales tax that each county would receive would hinge on population. In other words, it would require adding more people to the county to get a larger piece of the pie. How will this control over development?
This sounds like another scheme to reduce taxes for the wealthy and dump them on those people who are struggling to pay for medicine and food. Sounds like snake oil to me.
Goodness knows, I don't enjoy paying property taxes any more than the next person, but we all want police protection, fire protection and decent public schools for the children.
There's also the costs of infrastructure and water-sewer systems. This has to be paid for with taxes.
Another item in the article says Mr. Keen will introduce legislation to expand Scarlett-Williams. Why would this be necessary if he is doing away with property taxes?
Reba Stone
St. Simons Island
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Thursday, August 23, 2007
08/23 - Jekyll board chief answers Senator
Thu, Aug 23, 2007
By HANK ROWLAND
The Brunswick News
The chair of the Jekyll Island Authority, criticized around the state for recent actions by the board, says he and others are just doing their jobs.
Authority board chair Ben Porter indicates in a letter released Wednesday that the board of the Jekyll Island Authority is only trying to do what by statute it is supposed to do, and that's to oversee the operations of the island and make the state-owned park financially fit and independent.
Porter said that and more when defending actions over the past sseveral months by the board in a written response dated Aug. 20 to questions asked by Sen. Jeff Chapman, R-Brunswick.
Making the island attractive to tourists and those looking for a safe place to hold a convention is the whole purpose behind the new hotels planned on the island, including the $90 million hotel, condominium and convention complex proposed by Trammell Crow as a replacement for the aging Buccaneer.
That remains to be seen, said Chapman, who received a response to his concerns about development plans proposed on Jekyll Island in a letter from Porter Tuesday – three weeks after he asked for it.
"Trust but verify," Chapman said, citing former President Ronald Reagan. He said he needs to read and digest the four-page response carefully before commenting on its contents.
That may take as long as a week, he said.
"They had 20 days to answer me," said Chapman, whose letter to the board was dated July 30.
One of the primary questions Chapman wanted answered regarded the board's approval of a $10 million giveaway to Trammell Crow, a developer based in Texas.
Porter said in his letter to Chapman that the board merely agreed to give Trammell Crow the same deal it gave the Jekyll Hotel Club during its redevelopment.
"The only incentive being used in this project is an escalating rent formula to be paid to the JIA commensurate with the private investment and the lease term," Porter wrote. "The JIA has a history of doing this.
"The Jekyll Island Club rent structure provided for no rent during its first 10 years of operation. Years 11 and 12 are structured as a fixed rent. After that, 3 1/2 percent of gross revenues rent structure is charged."
Porter said the arrangement made it feasible for private investors to finance the $19 million necessary to renovate the original clubhouse.
The incentive pledged to Trammell Crow has been estimated to be worth $10 million.
"JIA used a similar approach...for the Buccaneer Hotel replacement development agreement to induce Trammell Crow to make a potential $90 million investment," Porter wrote. "JIA used the rent structure for the land lease as the primary negotiating tool to achieve important goals."
Porter said the urgency of the situation is apparent given the island's aging structures.
"I'm sure you are aware of the critical nature of hotel conditions on Jekyll Island," Porter wrote in his letter to Chapman. "We can no longer compete to bring in conference and convention business to produce revenues vital to provide infrastructure services on the island.
"Further, the survival of the many small businesses that operate on the island is totally dependent on visitor traffic."
He also addressed the affordability issue – another issue Chapman asked about.
Residents and others in the state claim the authority is interested in bringing only high cost hotels – a situation that would put vacations on the island out of reach of average Georgians.
"That is neither the plan nor the objective of the JIA," Porter wrote. "We intend that a variety of accommodations will be available to meet the needs of all Georgians."
By HANK ROWLAND
The Brunswick News
The chair of the Jekyll Island Authority, criticized around the state for recent actions by the board, says he and others are just doing their jobs.
Authority board chair Ben Porter indicates in a letter released Wednesday that the board of the Jekyll Island Authority is only trying to do what by statute it is supposed to do, and that's to oversee the operations of the island and make the state-owned park financially fit and independent.
Porter said that and more when defending actions over the past sseveral months by the board in a written response dated Aug. 20 to questions asked by Sen. Jeff Chapman, R-Brunswick.
Making the island attractive to tourists and those looking for a safe place to hold a convention is the whole purpose behind the new hotels planned on the island, including the $90 million hotel, condominium and convention complex proposed by Trammell Crow as a replacement for the aging Buccaneer.
That remains to be seen, said Chapman, who received a response to his concerns about development plans proposed on Jekyll Island in a letter from Porter Tuesday – three weeks after he asked for it.
"Trust but verify," Chapman said, citing former President Ronald Reagan. He said he needs to read and digest the four-page response carefully before commenting on its contents.
That may take as long as a week, he said.
"They had 20 days to answer me," said Chapman, whose letter to the board was dated July 30.
One of the primary questions Chapman wanted answered regarded the board's approval of a $10 million giveaway to Trammell Crow, a developer based in Texas.
Porter said in his letter to Chapman that the board merely agreed to give Trammell Crow the same deal it gave the Jekyll Hotel Club during its redevelopment.
"The only incentive being used in this project is an escalating rent formula to be paid to the JIA commensurate with the private investment and the lease term," Porter wrote. "The JIA has a history of doing this.
"The Jekyll Island Club rent structure provided for no rent during its first 10 years of operation. Years 11 and 12 are structured as a fixed rent. After that, 3 1/2 percent of gross revenues rent structure is charged."
Porter said the arrangement made it feasible for private investors to finance the $19 million necessary to renovate the original clubhouse.
The incentive pledged to Trammell Crow has been estimated to be worth $10 million.
"JIA used a similar approach...for the Buccaneer Hotel replacement development agreement to induce Trammell Crow to make a potential $90 million investment," Porter wrote. "JIA used the rent structure for the land lease as the primary negotiating tool to achieve important goals."
Porter said the urgency of the situation is apparent given the island's aging structures.
"I'm sure you are aware of the critical nature of hotel conditions on Jekyll Island," Porter wrote in his letter to Chapman. "We can no longer compete to bring in conference and convention business to produce revenues vital to provide infrastructure services on the island.
"Further, the survival of the many small businesses that operate on the island is totally dependent on visitor traffic."
He also addressed the affordability issue – another issue Chapman asked about.
Residents and others in the state claim the authority is interested in bringing only high cost hotels – a situation that would put vacations on the island out of reach of average Georgians.
"That is neither the plan nor the objective of the JIA," Porter wrote. "We intend that a variety of accommodations will be available to meet the needs of all Georgians."
08/22 - Jekyll Island: Section(s) Letters
Slugline Jekyll Island
Date August 22, 2007
Section(s) Letters
Chapman should be applauded for his efforts to prevent the Jekyll Island Authority from awarding a $10 M gift to a developer who wants to build a luxury hotel on Jekyll. Many developers will build hotels affordable for all Georgians on Jekyll without a $10 M giveaway program. We hope that Senator Chapman will insist that this giveaway be approved by the entire Georgia legislature and not leave it to Ben Porter to cede Georgians right to an affordable Jekyll Island. Georgia families want to continue to use this State Park island as it was originally intended for our use. Bert Richmond, Athens, Georgia
It is rewarding to see that a politician actually cares about the average person. Many times people appointed to councils are those that have been influenced by people with money and power. These propossed Hotels will make money, they should be paying for an opportunity to do business, not being paid. Georgia has a plum with Jekyll Island,please don't allow others to pluck it.
Earl Porterfield,Lincolnton, Georgia
Editor: I want to express my concern relating to current development proposals for Jekyll Island and the cost to Georgians.As time progresses hotels need to be modernized or replaced just as many of us have renovated or added additions to our homes. That being said, in the case of Jekyll Island and its facilities the market for which new development is directed must be carefully addressed. Cost of use of new facilities must be within the means of every Georgian. It is their island and not the plaything of the rich and powerful.There can be no justification for the $10,000,000 rent abatement package. Either the developer recognizes the viability of the investment or not. To expect taxpayers to underwrite his cost of business would also lead a person to assume that those same taxpayers would be privy to a share of the profits taken by the new owner. Now, if anyone believes that is going to happen, let me tell you about the ocean front property I have for sell in Nebraska.Taxpayers are routinely sold the proverbial barrel of goods when it comes to attracting new businesses and industry that tax abatements will provide new jobs and promote commercial activity to benefit the entire community. Well, that about this: If that is so true, has anyone ever seen a cost benefit analysis that reveals a positive cash flow to the community taxpayer? The answer is no and the reason is that the homeowner taxpayer always takes it on the chin.There needs to be a General Assembly investigation into the offering of the $10,000,000 rent abatement package. Something smells and it isn't the fresh sea air.
David E. Wittenberg, Kathleen, GA
Thank you for the article, published on Wednesday, Aug. 15, entitled, Senator Expecting Answers detailing Representative Chapman's queries to the JIA. Keeping this story alive via current news reports will help keep our politicians accountable. As a frequent visitor to the Golden Isles area, I do consider Jekyll Georgia's jewel and feel we all have a stake in how its development proceeds. Thank you for keeping us apprised. I will continue to follow this story in your newspaper.
Rebecca Z. ValentineDecatur, GA.
Thank you for Hank Rowland's comprehensive article giving Sen. Chapman's stance on the Jekyll Island initiatives. There are many Georgians who are asking the same questions as Sen. Chapman. Hopefully, the grass roots efforts of those people concerned that the Jekyll Island Authority is moving in the wrong direction will make a difference.
Theressa Vincent, Atlanta
Thanks so much for your publication of Hank Rowland's article of August 15th. He has addressed an issue that should be addressed by people and papers across the State of Georgia. Unfortunately, it appears the Jekyll Island Authority and some politicians have been so blinded by dollar signs they can no longer see or recognize the original mandate which was; to keep the island available and affordable to the Average Georgian. I would hazard a guess that those empowered to make this decision are not Average Georgians and therefore we desperately need the oversite committee to step in and protect the interest of those Average Georgians who elected them to office. I plan to try very hard to attend the meeting on August 30th, but if unable to do so, would greatly appreciate your paper making my feelings known.
Larry Pickett, Jackson, Ga.
As a Jesup resident and a day-user of Jekyll, I still have concerns about what the Authority is doing. The island should no must be preserved as it was originally intended as a State Park - not subject to high-end commercial ventures that serve only a privileged few - many of them non-Georgians. The Authority must remember and honor the intentions of Georgia resident's when our State tax money was spent originally and honor the trust that was placed on them to protect and conserve the island for our use and enjoyment. Playgrounds for the rich exist all along the coast. Don't let JI become just another one.
Deborah M. Oder, Jesup,GA.
It is good to know that Senator Jeff Chapman is asking highly relevant questions on the proposed $10 million in incentives being offered to Trammel Crow to re-develop Jekyll Island. The Jekyll Island Authority should know that folks all over this state are waiting to hear the answers and that we will not be satisfied simply by projections of profits. The purpose of Jekyll Island is not to enhance the state's coffers, but to be an affordable place for all Georgians to enjoy the natural beauty of our coastal areas.
Mary Bryan, Atlanta
Although I live in Marietta, as a near annual visitor to Jekyll Island these past thirty years I am quite concerned as to the future development of the island. If we wanted lots of shopping, fancy accommodations, or organized activities we would have gone to St. Simons or Hilton Head. Jekyll Island has been an oasis of relaxed recreation in a desert of over-development. It has also been affordable. As it was intended to be when it was purchased by the state.
Your article Senator expecting answers, 15 August 2007 should have been published statewide. I'm sure that there are a large number of Georgians from all over the state who would agree to the statement "What Senator Chapman said goes for me too".
Arthur C. Hughes, Marietta, GA
Senator Jeff Chapman is not the only one expecting answers from the Jekyll Island Authority. Multitudes of Georgians share his concerns. It would seem that a developer, angling for a piece of prime oceanfront property, would find it necessary to present an outstanding plan with financial incentives to those who control the property. The $10 million abatement offered to Trammel Crow is puzzling. It hardly makes sense that the JIA, while on the one hand bemoaning the sad condition of current island properties, would be willing to give away dollars that could be used to polish "Georgia's Jewel". Who benefits most from this type of deal? Certainly not the average citizen of Georgia. I attended last month's Jekyll Island Authority meeting, which took place while I was vacationing on the island. I was one of four people who presented affordability concerns to the Board. Affordability is a rather complex topic to tackle within the Board's three-minute time limit. Some of the responses received from the JIA Board were:*Proposed developments will not adversly affect those who visit the island on day trips.*Those planning an overnight stay can use the campground.*New, affordable motels may be built in the interior of the island.*Those who cannot afford the new rates can find another place for their vacation.I have enjoyed time on Jekyll Island with my family, and with church groups, every year since 1971. If development proceeds as the JIA envisions it, I will be forced to busy myself with becoming rich, so that my family may continue to enjoy the island.
Rev. Greg Lowery, Rentz,GA
Bravo to Senator Chapman, who has asked the Jekyll Island Authority questions we would all like to have answered (Senator Expecting Answers, 08/15/07). I have, on past occasions, sent my own questions to the Jekyll Island Authority. They did not respond to most of my questions, and I was forced to invoke the Georgia Open Records Act to acquire public documents from them. The Jekyll Island Authority must be held accountable for their management of a public treasure. There is now reasonable doubt that Jekyll Island State Park is being managed in the interest of the majority of Georgians. Three cheers to Senator Chapman and to the Brunswick News for keeping this issue alive and in front of the public!
Babs McDonald, Athens, GA
Thank you for printing Senator Chapman's views and concerns. I share the concerns. I spent this past Fathers' Day weekend at the Buccanneer, and had a completely enjoyable and afforadable time. Building such a high-usage facility to replace it is contrary not only to common sense, but completely disregards the demands made on the biggest part of the issue, i.e. water and sewage treatment. I can see the day coming, if such high-usage numbers as proposed by the developer happen, when the entire system on the island would have to be replaced, and if I were a gambling man, I would bet that the state taxpayers would end up having to pay for it. We have already seen the results of rampant development on St. Simons and Sea Island, neither of which I can afford to go visit. Please, don't let them take away my last opportunity to enjoy coastal Georgia. Don't forget that, thanks to M.E. Thompson, I own part of thay island myself.
Frank Kilgard, Jr.Valdosta, GA
Don't let Jekyll Island become another place just for the rich. We come to Jekyll every year to enjoy the tranquillity & pet friendliness of the island. We can't enjoy our own beaches because most affordable hotels have been torn down & replace with million dollar condos. Please don't let this happen to Jekyll. Yes the aging hotels to need to be rebuilt, but please find a balance with affordable lodging for the average person and the high priced resorts. Don't adhere to the belief the only rich people should enjoy an ocean view.
Mary Kitchin, Clearwater, Florida
Dear Editor, Thank you for your coverage of the Jekyll island commission's actions. I am deeply concerned that Jekyll will not stay affordable for the average visitor and that will be such a loss for nature lovers of all kinds. Jekyll is a treasure that the Georgia government has responsibility to maintain for all the people and I expect it to do just that, not to use the island to increase revenues for the coffers or th line the pockets of the developers. Please keep this issue before the public. Thank you for keeping on top of this important issue.
Jo Hamby, Pine Lake, Ga.
I commend Senator Chapman for challenging the JIA's plan to redevelop the island and specifically for his implicit challenge to the assumption that "development" must necessarily be good simply because it brings in more dollars. It is difficult to see how the proposed development adds to the character of this unique Georgia resource but it is easy to see how that character might be spoiled for many Georgians if the development is allowed to proceed.
Cary Grubbs, Griffin, GA
It is with deep concern that I write about what I have been reading and hearing about future plans for Jekyll Island. Although not a resident of Glynn Co. I am a resident of anadjoining county and a life long resident of the state of Ga.I was under the impression that Jekyll was established as aplace where all Georgians, and others, could go for a reasonable visit or vacation. Has the JIA lost that concept?Can we now anticipate our state owned Island becomingan exclusive retreat for the rich and famous? I think I representa number of people when I say that I truly hope not.
The Rev. Julian L.Tucker
Jekyll Island is a wonderful asset owned by the State of Georgia and dedicated to the benefit of all Georgia citizens. Its great economic potential through development must not blind our leaders to the island's other essential functions. Its unique recreational value must continue to be available to all Georgians and other guests of the state. The vast "Mashes of Glynn", the long magnificent beach, the coastal forest of Live Oak and Spanish moss, the sky, the sea, the stars, the family fun, must remain intact and accessible to all.Of course us taxpayers want the Island to run in the black, but excess profit is detrimental to the real purposes of the facility.Thank you Senator Chapman for asking some important questions.
G. Wood, Fayette County, GA
Date August 22, 2007
Section(s) Letters
Chapman should be applauded for his efforts to prevent the Jekyll Island Authority from awarding a $10 M gift to a developer who wants to build a luxury hotel on Jekyll. Many developers will build hotels affordable for all Georgians on Jekyll without a $10 M giveaway program. We hope that Senator Chapman will insist that this giveaway be approved by the entire Georgia legislature and not leave it to Ben Porter to cede Georgians right to an affordable Jekyll Island. Georgia families want to continue to use this State Park island as it was originally intended for our use. Bert Richmond, Athens, Georgia
It is rewarding to see that a politician actually cares about the average person. Many times people appointed to councils are those that have been influenced by people with money and power. These propossed Hotels will make money, they should be paying for an opportunity to do business, not being paid. Georgia has a plum with Jekyll Island,please don't allow others to pluck it.
Earl Porterfield,Lincolnton, Georgia
Editor: I want to express my concern relating to current development proposals for Jekyll Island and the cost to Georgians.As time progresses hotels need to be modernized or replaced just as many of us have renovated or added additions to our homes. That being said, in the case of Jekyll Island and its facilities the market for which new development is directed must be carefully addressed. Cost of use of new facilities must be within the means of every Georgian. It is their island and not the plaything of the rich and powerful.There can be no justification for the $10,000,000 rent abatement package. Either the developer recognizes the viability of the investment or not. To expect taxpayers to underwrite his cost of business would also lead a person to assume that those same taxpayers would be privy to a share of the profits taken by the new owner. Now, if anyone believes that is going to happen, let me tell you about the ocean front property I have for sell in Nebraska.Taxpayers are routinely sold the proverbial barrel of goods when it comes to attracting new businesses and industry that tax abatements will provide new jobs and promote commercial activity to benefit the entire community. Well, that about this: If that is so true, has anyone ever seen a cost benefit analysis that reveals a positive cash flow to the community taxpayer? The answer is no and the reason is that the homeowner taxpayer always takes it on the chin.There needs to be a General Assembly investigation into the offering of the $10,000,000 rent abatement package. Something smells and it isn't the fresh sea air.
David E. Wittenberg, Kathleen, GA
Thank you for the article, published on Wednesday, Aug. 15, entitled, Senator Expecting Answers detailing Representative Chapman's queries to the JIA. Keeping this story alive via current news reports will help keep our politicians accountable. As a frequent visitor to the Golden Isles area, I do consider Jekyll Georgia's jewel and feel we all have a stake in how its development proceeds. Thank you for keeping us apprised. I will continue to follow this story in your newspaper.
Rebecca Z. ValentineDecatur, GA.
Thank you for Hank Rowland's comprehensive article giving Sen. Chapman's stance on the Jekyll Island initiatives. There are many Georgians who are asking the same questions as Sen. Chapman. Hopefully, the grass roots efforts of those people concerned that the Jekyll Island Authority is moving in the wrong direction will make a difference.
Theressa Vincent, Atlanta
Thanks so much for your publication of Hank Rowland's article of August 15th. He has addressed an issue that should be addressed by people and papers across the State of Georgia. Unfortunately, it appears the Jekyll Island Authority and some politicians have been so blinded by dollar signs they can no longer see or recognize the original mandate which was; to keep the island available and affordable to the Average Georgian. I would hazard a guess that those empowered to make this decision are not Average Georgians and therefore we desperately need the oversite committee to step in and protect the interest of those Average Georgians who elected them to office. I plan to try very hard to attend the meeting on August 30th, but if unable to do so, would greatly appreciate your paper making my feelings known.
Larry Pickett, Jackson, Ga.
As a Jesup resident and a day-user of Jekyll, I still have concerns about what the Authority is doing. The island should no must be preserved as it was originally intended as a State Park - not subject to high-end commercial ventures that serve only a privileged few - many of them non-Georgians. The Authority must remember and honor the intentions of Georgia resident's when our State tax money was spent originally and honor the trust that was placed on them to protect and conserve the island for our use and enjoyment. Playgrounds for the rich exist all along the coast. Don't let JI become just another one.
Deborah M. Oder, Jesup,GA.
It is good to know that Senator Jeff Chapman is asking highly relevant questions on the proposed $10 million in incentives being offered to Trammel Crow to re-develop Jekyll Island. The Jekyll Island Authority should know that folks all over this state are waiting to hear the answers and that we will not be satisfied simply by projections of profits. The purpose of Jekyll Island is not to enhance the state's coffers, but to be an affordable place for all Georgians to enjoy the natural beauty of our coastal areas.
Mary Bryan, Atlanta
Although I live in Marietta, as a near annual visitor to Jekyll Island these past thirty years I am quite concerned as to the future development of the island. If we wanted lots of shopping, fancy accommodations, or organized activities we would have gone to St. Simons or Hilton Head. Jekyll Island has been an oasis of relaxed recreation in a desert of over-development. It has also been affordable. As it was intended to be when it was purchased by the state.
Your article Senator expecting answers, 15 August 2007 should have been published statewide. I'm sure that there are a large number of Georgians from all over the state who would agree to the statement "What Senator Chapman said goes for me too".
Arthur C. Hughes, Marietta, GA
Senator Jeff Chapman is not the only one expecting answers from the Jekyll Island Authority. Multitudes of Georgians share his concerns. It would seem that a developer, angling for a piece of prime oceanfront property, would find it necessary to present an outstanding plan with financial incentives to those who control the property. The $10 million abatement offered to Trammel Crow is puzzling. It hardly makes sense that the JIA, while on the one hand bemoaning the sad condition of current island properties, would be willing to give away dollars that could be used to polish "Georgia's Jewel". Who benefits most from this type of deal? Certainly not the average citizen of Georgia. I attended last month's Jekyll Island Authority meeting, which took place while I was vacationing on the island. I was one of four people who presented affordability concerns to the Board. Affordability is a rather complex topic to tackle within the Board's three-minute time limit. Some of the responses received from the JIA Board were:*Proposed developments will not adversly affect those who visit the island on day trips.*Those planning an overnight stay can use the campground.*New, affordable motels may be built in the interior of the island.*Those who cannot afford the new rates can find another place for their vacation.I have enjoyed time on Jekyll Island with my family, and with church groups, every year since 1971. If development proceeds as the JIA envisions it, I will be forced to busy myself with becoming rich, so that my family may continue to enjoy the island.
Rev. Greg Lowery, Rentz,GA
Bravo to Senator Chapman, who has asked the Jekyll Island Authority questions we would all like to have answered (Senator Expecting Answers, 08/15/07). I have, on past occasions, sent my own questions to the Jekyll Island Authority. They did not respond to most of my questions, and I was forced to invoke the Georgia Open Records Act to acquire public documents from them. The Jekyll Island Authority must be held accountable for their management of a public treasure. There is now reasonable doubt that Jekyll Island State Park is being managed in the interest of the majority of Georgians. Three cheers to Senator Chapman and to the Brunswick News for keeping this issue alive and in front of the public!
Babs McDonald, Athens, GA
Thank you for printing Senator Chapman's views and concerns. I share the concerns. I spent this past Fathers' Day weekend at the Buccanneer, and had a completely enjoyable and afforadable time. Building such a high-usage facility to replace it is contrary not only to common sense, but completely disregards the demands made on the biggest part of the issue, i.e. water and sewage treatment. I can see the day coming, if such high-usage numbers as proposed by the developer happen, when the entire system on the island would have to be replaced, and if I were a gambling man, I would bet that the state taxpayers would end up having to pay for it. We have already seen the results of rampant development on St. Simons and Sea Island, neither of which I can afford to go visit. Please, don't let them take away my last opportunity to enjoy coastal Georgia. Don't forget that, thanks to M.E. Thompson, I own part of thay island myself.
Frank Kilgard, Jr.Valdosta, GA
Don't let Jekyll Island become another place just for the rich. We come to Jekyll every year to enjoy the tranquillity & pet friendliness of the island. We can't enjoy our own beaches because most affordable hotels have been torn down & replace with million dollar condos. Please don't let this happen to Jekyll. Yes the aging hotels to need to be rebuilt, but please find a balance with affordable lodging for the average person and the high priced resorts. Don't adhere to the belief the only rich people should enjoy an ocean view.
Mary Kitchin, Clearwater, Florida
Dear Editor, Thank you for your coverage of the Jekyll island commission's actions. I am deeply concerned that Jekyll will not stay affordable for the average visitor and that will be such a loss for nature lovers of all kinds. Jekyll is a treasure that the Georgia government has responsibility to maintain for all the people and I expect it to do just that, not to use the island to increase revenues for the coffers or th line the pockets of the developers. Please keep this issue before the public. Thank you for keeping on top of this important issue.
Jo Hamby, Pine Lake, Ga.
I commend Senator Chapman for challenging the JIA's plan to redevelop the island and specifically for his implicit challenge to the assumption that "development" must necessarily be good simply because it brings in more dollars. It is difficult to see how the proposed development adds to the character of this unique Georgia resource but it is easy to see how that character might be spoiled for many Georgians if the development is allowed to proceed.
Cary Grubbs, Griffin, GA
It is with deep concern that I write about what I have been reading and hearing about future plans for Jekyll Island. Although not a resident of Glynn Co. I am a resident of anadjoining county and a life long resident of the state of Ga.I was under the impression that Jekyll was established as aplace where all Georgians, and others, could go for a reasonable visit or vacation. Has the JIA lost that concept?Can we now anticipate our state owned Island becomingan exclusive retreat for the rich and famous? I think I representa number of people when I say that I truly hope not.
The Rev. Julian L.Tucker
Jekyll Island is a wonderful asset owned by the State of Georgia and dedicated to the benefit of all Georgia citizens. Its great economic potential through development must not blind our leaders to the island's other essential functions. Its unique recreational value must continue to be available to all Georgians and other guests of the state. The vast "Mashes of Glynn", the long magnificent beach, the coastal forest of Live Oak and Spanish moss, the sky, the sea, the stars, the family fun, must remain intact and accessible to all.Of course us taxpayers want the Island to run in the black, but excess profit is detrimental to the real purposes of the facility.Thank you Senator Chapman for asking some important questions.
G. Wood, Fayette County, GA
Saturday, August 18, 2007
08/17 - Your idea of 'affordable?'
Brunswick News
Date August 17, 2007
Section(s) Letters
Walter Geiger, in his guest editorial column, writes about his memories of trips to Jekyll Island. Thousands of Georgians would love to add stories of their own to his. Most of these same visitors would agree with Geiger that Jekyll's aging hotels need to be updated or replaced.
What Geiger fails to consider is that the losers in the developer free-for-all he proposes for revitalizing the island would be the tens of thousands of Jekyll's long-time visitors who are drawn to Jekyll because of its unique character and affordability.
Mr. Geiger, get with the program!
The kind of development that is being courted by the Jekyll Island Authority's Board would be most unfriendly to the conventions you would like to see return to Jekyll. Can the folks attending the Georgia Rural Water Association's convention afford $250 a night hotel rooms?
Is this what you, Mr. Geiger, deem "affordable" for the average Georgian? If you answer yes to these questions you are out of touch with the Jekyll Island of your youth and the Jekyll Island that is cherished by tens of thousands of its visitors. Jekyll needs responsible stewardship from the JIA Board.
That stewardship includes the responsibility of upholding Jekyll's affordability mandate and embracing, not disenfranchising, the clientele that has sought out Jekyll as a vacation and convention site for decades and decades.
Margery Rubin
Date August 17, 2007
Section(s) Letters
Walter Geiger, in his guest editorial column, writes about his memories of trips to Jekyll Island. Thousands of Georgians would love to add stories of their own to his. Most of these same visitors would agree with Geiger that Jekyll's aging hotels need to be updated or replaced.
What Geiger fails to consider is that the losers in the developer free-for-all he proposes for revitalizing the island would be the tens of thousands of Jekyll's long-time visitors who are drawn to Jekyll because of its unique character and affordability.
Mr. Geiger, get with the program!
The kind of development that is being courted by the Jekyll Island Authority's Board would be most unfriendly to the conventions you would like to see return to Jekyll. Can the folks attending the Georgia Rural Water Association's convention afford $250 a night hotel rooms?
Is this what you, Mr. Geiger, deem "affordable" for the average Georgian? If you answer yes to these questions you are out of touch with the Jekyll Island of your youth and the Jekyll Island that is cherished by tens of thousands of its visitors. Jekyll needs responsible stewardship from the JIA Board.
That stewardship includes the responsibility of upholding Jekyll's affordability mandate and embracing, not disenfranchising, the clientele that has sought out Jekyll as a vacation and convention site for decades and decades.
Margery Rubin
Thursday, August 16, 2007
08/15 - Good people on Jekyll
Date August 15, 2007
Section(s) Letters
Which heyday are you speaking of reaching?
I have read with great interest the recent letters and editorials concerning the fate of Jekyll Island.
My family resides in Alabama and we have vacationed on Jekyll for a number of years.
We are an "average" family much like those that Jekyll is presently mandated to be affordable to.
Rep. Steven Davis' latest comments beg the question, which heyday would he like to return Jekyll to? Is it the one over 100 years ago when Jekyll was an exclusive club?
It would seem to be that when you look at the proposals for new developement.
Some of the comments made in support of expensive hotels and condos seem to insinuate that the state of Georgia is somehow discriminating against "above average families" by Jekyll not having more expensive lodging.
Replacing affordable lodging with more expensive rooms only serves to exclude, not include, families.
There are fancy hotels and condo developements all along the Georgia coast,
I would hope that the JIA and Georgia's governing officials realize that presently they have a resource that everyone can use and enjoy regardless of income and will work to keep it that way so that visitors to your fine state will always have a reason to return.
Paul Patterson
Gurley, Alabama
Section(s) Letters
Which heyday are you speaking of reaching?
I have read with great interest the recent letters and editorials concerning the fate of Jekyll Island.
My family resides in Alabama and we have vacationed on Jekyll for a number of years.
We are an "average" family much like those that Jekyll is presently mandated to be affordable to.
Rep. Steven Davis' latest comments beg the question, which heyday would he like to return Jekyll to? Is it the one over 100 years ago when Jekyll was an exclusive club?
It would seem to be that when you look at the proposals for new developement.
Some of the comments made in support of expensive hotels and condos seem to insinuate that the state of Georgia is somehow discriminating against "above average families" by Jekyll not having more expensive lodging.
Replacing affordable lodging with more expensive rooms only serves to exclude, not include, families.
There are fancy hotels and condo developements all along the Georgia coast,
I would hope that the JIA and Georgia's governing officials realize that presently they have a resource that everyone can use and enjoy regardless of income and will work to keep it that way so that visitors to your fine state will always have a reason to return.
Paul Patterson
Gurley, Alabama
08/15 - Senator expecting answers
Date August 15, 2007
Section(s) Local News
By HANK ROWLAND
The Brunswick News
State Sen. Jeff Chapman, R-Brunswick, says he's waiting for the Jekyll Island Authority to respond to questions he has about a past action it took and about the future of the state-owned island.
Chapman wants to know, among other things, what the authority hopes to gain by handing a developer $10 million in incentives to build and operate a new hotel complex on the island and how it plans to keep the island within the price range of Georgians.
Chapman is particularly interested in hearing what the authority has to say about the incentives it's giving Trammell Crow, developer of a proposed $90 million, 540-room hotel-condominium complex with meeting space, restaurants and spa. The development will replace the aging Buccaneer Hotel.
The authority approved a $10 million rent abatement package for Trammel Crow in July.
"I want to know how giving away $10 million helps them and helps Jekyll become what it needs to be," Chapman said.
Ben G. Porter, chair of the authority, defended the package earlier, noting that the new development will more than make up for the incentives because it will yield millions of dollars more in tax and lease revenue than the current facility.
Chapman also is concerned about any plans to replace existing hotels with high-end accommodations and the ability of state residents of average income to be able to enjoy one of Georgia's assets.
"I don't want the authority to lose sight of the original intent of this public asset," Chapman said. "It was bought for the average Georgian of average income. That includes an overnight stay.
"The board is obligated, empowered, to do everything necessary to make that happen."
Bill Donohue, executive director of the Jekyll Island Authority, said Chapman - who wrote the JIA a letter - will have his answer this week.
"I spoke with (Chapman) today and told him he would receive our response on Thursday," Donohue said Tuesday.
Chapman is not the only one concerned about affordability. Keep Jekyll Island Affordable, a campaign headed up by Jekyll resident David Egan, is collecting signatures everywhere it can to show Gov. Sonny Perdue and the authority that Georgians are watching what they do.
"In the brief span of time we've been conducting our campaign, we have secured over 2,000 petition signatures and survey responses on the affordability question, as well as over 100 pages of affordability-related commentary from Georgians across the state and from Jekyll's many advocates in other parts of America," said Egan, co-director of the Initiative to Protect Jekyll Island.
The goal of the organization is 100,000 signatures.
"Even if we fall short of that figure, I believe we will be able to establish our point," Egan said.
It has established a point with the Altamaha Riverkeeper, which is urging its members to sign the petition and to spread it around.
"Our organization is deeply concerned about the JIA's effort to promote high-end and highly consumptive uses of the island, in contrast to more recreational activities," said Deborah Sheppard, executive director of the Altamaha Riverkeeper.
"There is concern on the part of many residents that sweetheart deals by the JIA will run counter to any effort to make the island available to common people."
Section(s) Local News
By HANK ROWLAND
The Brunswick News
State Sen. Jeff Chapman, R-Brunswick, says he's waiting for the Jekyll Island Authority to respond to questions he has about a past action it took and about the future of the state-owned island.
Chapman wants to know, among other things, what the authority hopes to gain by handing a developer $10 million in incentives to build and operate a new hotel complex on the island and how it plans to keep the island within the price range of Georgians.
Chapman is particularly interested in hearing what the authority has to say about the incentives it's giving Trammell Crow, developer of a proposed $90 million, 540-room hotel-condominium complex with meeting space, restaurants and spa. The development will replace the aging Buccaneer Hotel.
The authority approved a $10 million rent abatement package for Trammel Crow in July.
"I want to know how giving away $10 million helps them and helps Jekyll become what it needs to be," Chapman said.
Ben G. Porter, chair of the authority, defended the package earlier, noting that the new development will more than make up for the incentives because it will yield millions of dollars more in tax and lease revenue than the current facility.
Chapman also is concerned about any plans to replace existing hotels with high-end accommodations and the ability of state residents of average income to be able to enjoy one of Georgia's assets.
"I don't want the authority to lose sight of the original intent of this public asset," Chapman said. "It was bought for the average Georgian of average income. That includes an overnight stay.
"The board is obligated, empowered, to do everything necessary to make that happen."
Bill Donohue, executive director of the Jekyll Island Authority, said Chapman - who wrote the JIA a letter - will have his answer this week.
"I spoke with (Chapman) today and told him he would receive our response on Thursday," Donohue said Tuesday.
Chapman is not the only one concerned about affordability. Keep Jekyll Island Affordable, a campaign headed up by Jekyll resident David Egan, is collecting signatures everywhere it can to show Gov. Sonny Perdue and the authority that Georgians are watching what they do.
"In the brief span of time we've been conducting our campaign, we have secured over 2,000 petition signatures and survey responses on the affordability question, as well as over 100 pages of affordability-related commentary from Georgians across the state and from Jekyll's many advocates in other parts of America," said Egan, co-director of the Initiative to Protect Jekyll Island.
The goal of the organization is 100,000 signatures.
"Even if we fall short of that figure, I believe we will be able to establish our point," Egan said.
It has established a point with the Altamaha Riverkeeper, which is urging its members to sign the petition and to spread it around.
"Our organization is deeply concerned about the JIA's effort to promote high-end and highly consumptive uses of the island, in contrast to more recreational activities," said Deborah Sheppard, executive director of the Altamaha Riverkeeper.
"There is concern on the part of many residents that sweetheart deals by the JIA will run counter to any effort to make the island available to common people."
08/14 - A love-hate relationship
Date August 14, 2007
Section(s) Commentary
Walter Geiger
Guest Columnist
When I was a kid, my family took frequent trips to Jekyll Island.
Our destination was just an hour's drive south on Highway 17 from our Savannah home.
I can remember my excitement at seeing the signs for Jekyll just on the other side of the 'big bridge' in Brunswick.
I always tried to hold my breath going over the 'big bridge'. I was a teenager before I could make it across.
Of course, that bridge has now been replaced by an even bigger bridge that nearly requires supplemental oxygen to traverse.
Growing up, we went to Tybee Island all the time but Jekyll held a special appeal.
It had hotels named Wanderer and Buccaneer, conjuring up visions of Pirates, their ships and hidden booty in my fertile young mind.
Speaking of booty, I was traipsing through a wooded area just inland from the Jekyll dunes on one trip when I came across a couple on a beach towel in the throes of passion. I was too young to understand precisely what it was they were doing and they were too entranced with each other to notice my presence.
After a long moment, I left them to their embrace, wondering what it was I had just witnessed.
When I returned to school in the fall, a kid named Charles explained it all to me.
He was, after all, in the sixth grade and an expert on matters of the heart.
Jekyll also had the Aquarama with its huge indoor pool and a high dive to die for.
A belly flop off that baby would leave red whelps on your stomach for a week and a perfectly executed can opener would send a splash what seemed to be a mile in the air.
For whatever reason, my family quit going to Jekyll.
My trips there resumed when we began attending the annual Georgia Press Association convention.
We always looked forward to the GPA convention and still do.
GPA took thousands of journalists to Jekyll each year until someone down there botched our reservations for meeting facilities and we moved it to Hilton Head at the last minute.Suddenly, our horizons were expanded.
This triggered a fight within GPA that lingers to this day. Some publishers want resort standard accommodations which Jekyll, sadly, does not have.
Others insist we stay in Georgia or they won't participate.
I was vice-president of GPA during the convention when we used the Aquarama facility for meetings for the last time.
I had to preside over the evening's festivities and was nervously pacing outside the building while going over in my head what I was going to say.
We had checked into our room earlier in the day to find an elongated toilet with a normal toilet seat attached.
This enraged my bride and made toileting a tad difficult for me.
Others had endured similar experiences.
Sentiment to move the convention from Jekyll permanently was running red hot.
The Aquarama air conditioning was on the fritz and its huge windows were steamed over.
I watched as our colleagues arrived.
The men were in black tie. The women were dressed to the nines.
They gathered in groups of eight to 10 in the parking lot before entering the building.
Then, the automatic sprinkler system came on and drenched them all under its spray.
That pretty much knocked Jekyll off my list for good.
That was 15 years ago and Jekyll has deteriorated drastically since. Now its biggest annual convention is that of the Barnesville-based Georgia Rural Water Association. It's executive director, former Barnesville mayor Jimmy Matthews, says his convention takes in excess of 3000 people to the island."
There is only one decent hotel now.
All the rest don't have the cash flow to maintain their facilities," Matthews laments.
There is hope on the horizon, however.
The Jekyll Island Authority has finally seen the light and is partnering with private developers who want to tear down the old lodging and erect new, modern hotels with meeting facilities of their own.
The authority has drawn heavy fire from many quarters for an alleged 'sweetheart' deal cut with one development firm.
I say let the developers take their best shot at Jekyll.
The place is a dump!
Private developers can do it no more harm than Georgia's ongoing negligence has.
Section(s) Commentary
Walter Geiger
Guest Columnist
When I was a kid, my family took frequent trips to Jekyll Island.
Our destination was just an hour's drive south on Highway 17 from our Savannah home.
I can remember my excitement at seeing the signs for Jekyll just on the other side of the 'big bridge' in Brunswick.
I always tried to hold my breath going over the 'big bridge'. I was a teenager before I could make it across.
Of course, that bridge has now been replaced by an even bigger bridge that nearly requires supplemental oxygen to traverse.
Growing up, we went to Tybee Island all the time but Jekyll held a special appeal.
It had hotels named Wanderer and Buccaneer, conjuring up visions of Pirates, their ships and hidden booty in my fertile young mind.
Speaking of booty, I was traipsing through a wooded area just inland from the Jekyll dunes on one trip when I came across a couple on a beach towel in the throes of passion. I was too young to understand precisely what it was they were doing and they were too entranced with each other to notice my presence.
After a long moment, I left them to their embrace, wondering what it was I had just witnessed.
When I returned to school in the fall, a kid named Charles explained it all to me.
He was, after all, in the sixth grade and an expert on matters of the heart.
Jekyll also had the Aquarama with its huge indoor pool and a high dive to die for.
A belly flop off that baby would leave red whelps on your stomach for a week and a perfectly executed can opener would send a splash what seemed to be a mile in the air.
For whatever reason, my family quit going to Jekyll.
My trips there resumed when we began attending the annual Georgia Press Association convention.
We always looked forward to the GPA convention and still do.
GPA took thousands of journalists to Jekyll each year until someone down there botched our reservations for meeting facilities and we moved it to Hilton Head at the last minute.Suddenly, our horizons were expanded.
This triggered a fight within GPA that lingers to this day. Some publishers want resort standard accommodations which Jekyll, sadly, does not have.
Others insist we stay in Georgia or they won't participate.
I was vice-president of GPA during the convention when we used the Aquarama facility for meetings for the last time.
I had to preside over the evening's festivities and was nervously pacing outside the building while going over in my head what I was going to say.
We had checked into our room earlier in the day to find an elongated toilet with a normal toilet seat attached.
This enraged my bride and made toileting a tad difficult for me.
Others had endured similar experiences.
Sentiment to move the convention from Jekyll permanently was running red hot.
The Aquarama air conditioning was on the fritz and its huge windows were steamed over.
I watched as our colleagues arrived.
The men were in black tie. The women were dressed to the nines.
They gathered in groups of eight to 10 in the parking lot before entering the building.
Then, the automatic sprinkler system came on and drenched them all under its spray.
That pretty much knocked Jekyll off my list for good.
That was 15 years ago and Jekyll has deteriorated drastically since. Now its biggest annual convention is that of the Barnesville-based Georgia Rural Water Association. It's executive director, former Barnesville mayor Jimmy Matthews, says his convention takes in excess of 3000 people to the island."
There is only one decent hotel now.
All the rest don't have the cash flow to maintain their facilities," Matthews laments.
There is hope on the horizon, however.
The Jekyll Island Authority has finally seen the light and is partnering with private developers who want to tear down the old lodging and erect new, modern hotels with meeting facilities of their own.
The authority has drawn heavy fire from many quarters for an alleged 'sweetheart' deal cut with one development firm.
I say let the developers take their best shot at Jekyll.
The place is a dump!
Private developers can do it no more harm than Georgia's ongoing negligence has.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)