ajc.com > Business
By Dan Chapman
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/16/08
Critics of Jekyll Island's proposed condo-hotel redevelopment plan vowed Tuesday to launch legislative attacks and additional legal challenges against the upscale developer's $352 million project.
Legislators, environmentalists, residents and anti-development activists used a seemingly routine hearing at the Capitol to attack Linger Longer Communities' "Beach Village" plan that would add 1,100 hotel, condo, cottage and time-share units to the state park.
Sen. Jeff Chapman (R-Brunswick), whose district includes the state-owned island, said he's likely to introduce legislation to curtail development and, possibly, to mandate that the island remain affordable and accessible to "all Georgians," as state law requires. Chapman helped lead the legislative charge last year to prohibit development of Jekyll's south end.
Linger Longer, along with Jekyll Island Authority board members, responded that redevelopment plans remain fluid and could change.
Yet their ire over the growing anti-development fervor couldn't be disguised.
"Jekyll needs to be fixed," board member Steve Croy said to the more than 150 people stuffed into a legislative hearing room. "We'll just have to put up with these naysayers until we get the project fixed."
Linger Longer's plan touts an environmentally benign "town center" filled with families, conventioneers, greenways, hotel rooms, shops and restaurants. The 64-acre project would front the Atlantic Ocean along one of the most pristine stretches of Georgia coast. Much of the construction would be east of Beachview Drive and require the demolition of the convention center and a huge parking lot.
Chapman wants all construction built west of the coastal roadway so the beach remains readily accessible to all Georgians, not just those renting condos or staying at the 400-room hotel (average daily room rate: $183) planned for the site.
"Let's not forget that Jekyll is not private property," Chapman said. "It's a public beach."
Last year in the Senate, Chapman shepherded legislation that prohibited development of the island's south end. He said he's again prepared to try and legislatively protect a popular stretch of the state park.
Jim Langford, the project executive for Linger Longer, said sparing property east of the roadway might require builders to push farther west into the island's maritime forest —- an environmental either/or situation that promises to displease somebody.
"Potential visitors ... strongly desire accommodation close to the beach," he said in an interview. "They feel it's important to have some contact with the beach."
Board member Ed Boshears questioned Langford over the affordability of the project's 1,100 rooms. Langford said 72 percent of all of the rooms proposed for the island will rent for, on average, less than $139 a night. But critics said many of those rooms would only be found in two- or three-bedroom condos, not in hotels. That would mean families could be spending two or three times that average amount each night.
"It's very deceptive of these people to claim these units will be affordable," Boshears said.
Chapman had requested earlier that the state attorney general's office investigate whether Linger Longer's project conforms with the state's affordability mandate.
Environmental groups, including the Georgia Conservancy and the Center For a Sustainable Coast, criticized the project's proximity to sand dunes.
Linger Longer was surprised to learn earlier this month that its project might need an environmental permit to build close to the beach.
Jamie Reynolds, vice chairman of Linger Longer, vowed that the "Beach Village" will maintain "the protection and enhancement of natural resources."
The island's governing board was buoyed Monday when a Fulton County Superior Court judge turned back a legal challenge to Linger Longer's plan, allowing the redevelopment to move forward.
On Tuesday, critics vowed other legal fights if the plan isn't scaled back.
"It is our intention to challenge this effort through every legal means available to us," said Frank Mirasola, president of the Jekyll Island Citizens Association.
Thursday, January 17, 2008
01/15 - Critics of Jekyll project vow legislative attacks
By DAN CHAPMAN
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/15/08
Critics of Jekyll Island's proposed condo-hotel redevelopment plan vowed Tuesday to launch legislative attacks and additional legal challenges against the upscale developer's $352 million project.
Legislators, environmentalists, residents and anti-development activists used a seemingly routine hearing at the Capitol to attack Linger Longer Communities' "Beach Village" plan that would add 1,100 hotel, condo, cottage and time-share units to the state park.
Sen. Jeff Chapman (R-Brunswick), whose district includes the state-owned island, said he's likely to introduce legislation to curtail development and, possibly, to mandate the island remain affordable and accessible to "all Georgians," as state law requires. Chapman helped lead the legislative charge last year to prohibit development of Jekyll's south end.
Linger Longer, along with Jekyll Island Authority board members, responded that redevelopment plans remain fluid and could change. Yet their ire over the growing anti-development fervor couldn't be disguised.
"Jekyll needs to be fixed," stated board member Steve Croy said to the more than 150 people stuffed into a legislative hearing room. "We'll just have to put up with these naysayers until we get the project fixed."
Linger Longer's plan touts an environmentally benign "town center" filled with families, conventioneers, greenways, hotel rooms, shops and restaurants. The 64-acre project would front the Atlantic Ocean along one of the most pristine stretches of Georgia coast. Much of the construction would sit eastward of Beachview Drive and require the demolition of the convention center and a huge parking lot.
Chapman wants all construction built west of the coastal roadway so the beach remains accessible to all Georgians, not just those renting condos or staying at the 400-room hotel (average daily room rate: $183) planned for the site.
"Let's not forget that Jekyll is not private property," Chapman said. "It's a public beach."
Last year in the Senate, Chapman shepherded legislation that prohibited development of the island's South end. He said he's again prepared to try and legislatively protect a popular stretch of the state park.
Jim Langford, the project executive for Linger Longer, said sparing property east of the roadway might require builders to push farther west into the island's maritime forest — an environmental either-or situation that promises to displease somebody.
"Potential visitors ... strongly desire accommodation close to the beach," he said in an interview. "They feel it's important to have some contact with the beach."
Board member Ed Boshears questioned Langford over the affordability of the project's 1,100 rooms. Langford said 72 percent of all of the the rooms proposed for the island will rent for, on average, less than $139 a night. But critics said many of those rooms would only be found in two- or three-bedroom condos, not in hotels. That would mean families could be spending two or three times that average amount each night.
"It's very deceptive of these people to claim these units will be affordable," Boshears said.
Chapman earlier requested that the state Attorney General's office investigate whether Linger Longer's project conforms with the state's affordability mandate.
Environmental groups, including the Georgia Conservancy and the Center For A Sustainable Coast, criticized the project's proximity to sand dunes. Linger Longer was surprised to learn earlier this month that its project might need an environmental permit to build close to the beach.
Jamie Reynolds, vice chairman of Linger Longer, vowed the "Beach Village" will maintain "the protection and enhancement of natural resources."
The island's governing board was buoyed Monday when a Fulton County Superior Court judge turned back a legal challenge to Linger Longer's plan, allowing the redevelopment to move forward. But critics Tuesday, though, vowed other legal fights if the plan isn't scaled back.
"It is our intention to challenge this effort through every legal means available to us," said Frank Mirasola, president of the Jekyll Island Citizens Association.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/15/08
Critics of Jekyll Island's proposed condo-hotel redevelopment plan vowed Tuesday to launch legislative attacks and additional legal challenges against the upscale developer's $352 million project.
Legislators, environmentalists, residents and anti-development activists used a seemingly routine hearing at the Capitol to attack Linger Longer Communities' "Beach Village" plan that would add 1,100 hotel, condo, cottage and time-share units to the state park.
Sen. Jeff Chapman (R-Brunswick), whose district includes the state-owned island, said he's likely to introduce legislation to curtail development and, possibly, to mandate the island remain affordable and accessible to "all Georgians," as state law requires. Chapman helped lead the legislative charge last year to prohibit development of Jekyll's south end.
Linger Longer, along with Jekyll Island Authority board members, responded that redevelopment plans remain fluid and could change. Yet their ire over the growing anti-development fervor couldn't be disguised.
"Jekyll needs to be fixed," stated board member Steve Croy said to the more than 150 people stuffed into a legislative hearing room. "We'll just have to put up with these naysayers until we get the project fixed."
Linger Longer's plan touts an environmentally benign "town center" filled with families, conventioneers, greenways, hotel rooms, shops and restaurants. The 64-acre project would front the Atlantic Ocean along one of the most pristine stretches of Georgia coast. Much of the construction would sit eastward of Beachview Drive and require the demolition of the convention center and a huge parking lot.
Chapman wants all construction built west of the coastal roadway so the beach remains accessible to all Georgians, not just those renting condos or staying at the 400-room hotel (average daily room rate: $183) planned for the site.
"Let's not forget that Jekyll is not private property," Chapman said. "It's a public beach."
Last year in the Senate, Chapman shepherded legislation that prohibited development of the island's South end. He said he's again prepared to try and legislatively protect a popular stretch of the state park.
Jim Langford, the project executive for Linger Longer, said sparing property east of the roadway might require builders to push farther west into the island's maritime forest — an environmental either-or situation that promises to displease somebody.
"Potential visitors ... strongly desire accommodation close to the beach," he said in an interview. "They feel it's important to have some contact with the beach."
Board member Ed Boshears questioned Langford over the affordability of the project's 1,100 rooms. Langford said 72 percent of all of the the rooms proposed for the island will rent for, on average, less than $139 a night. But critics said many of those rooms would only be found in two- or three-bedroom condos, not in hotels. That would mean families could be spending two or three times that average amount each night.
"It's very deceptive of these people to claim these units will be affordable," Boshears said.
Chapman earlier requested that the state Attorney General's office investigate whether Linger Longer's project conforms with the state's affordability mandate.
Environmental groups, including the Georgia Conservancy and the Center For A Sustainable Coast, criticized the project's proximity to sand dunes. Linger Longer was surprised to learn earlier this month that its project might need an environmental permit to build close to the beach.
Jamie Reynolds, vice chairman of Linger Longer, vowed the "Beach Village" will maintain "the protection and enhancement of natural resources."
The island's governing board was buoyed Monday when a Fulton County Superior Court judge turned back a legal challenge to Linger Longer's plan, allowing the redevelopment to move forward. But critics Tuesday, though, vowed other legal fights if the plan isn't scaled back.
"It is our intention to challenge this effort through every legal means available to us," said Frank Mirasola, president of the Jekyll Island Citizens Association.
01/15 - Jekyll project upheld in court
ajc.com > Business
Judge rejects challenge by losing bidder for redevelopment deal on island.
By Dan Chapman
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/15/08
A Fulton County Superior Court judge on Monday allowed the large-scale redevelopment of Jekyll Island to go forward, turning back a challenge from a losing bidder who claimed the state unfairly awarded the contract.
Judge Jerry Baxter's ruling lets Linger Longer Communities continue with its $352 million condo-hotel-retail project in the state park near Brunswick. The Greensboro, Ga.-based developer plans 1,100 condo, hotel and time-share units fronting the Atlantic Ocean.
"Obviously we think the judge is correct on both grounds —- dismissing the complaint for lack of standing and denying the injunction for lack of merit," said Linger Longer attorney Emmet Bondurant, who argued alongside the counsel for the Jekyll Island Authority.
Wade Shealy Jr., whose company lost the bid, sued the authority after it awarded the contract in September. The Jekyll Island Authority and Linger Longer prevailed Monday when Baxter determined the process was fair. A disappointed Shealy said he'll likely appeal Baxter's decision to deny the injunction.
"It's not over. We still believe the process was flawed, and we want to see it done right," said Shealy, who spent $925,000 on his bid.
The crux of Monday's decision revolved around how many acres were in play. In its request for proposals last year, the authority stipulated eight times that the "town center" project would encompass 45 acres. Shealy's Jekyll Island Revitalization Group and Trammell Crow Co., another bidder, adhered to the 45-acre parameter.
Linger Longer, however, used 64 acres in its plan. By using fewer acres, Shealy said, the degree of green space and density —- two major selection criteria —- was unfairly skewed.
The authority disagreed. Its attorney, George Zier, testified Monday that the bid for the "town center" site was fluid and allowed for the construction of hotel and parking, for example, beyond the 45 acres.
"That was perfectly permissible from day one, page one," Zier said. The bid by Shealy and partners "imploded of their own volition, not by anything the authority did. . . . They lost fair and square."
Zier also questioned whether Shealy's group could secure sufficient financing for the large-scale development.
Shealy and his attorneys labeled questions over financing and "standing" —- whether his group could legally challenge the bid —- as "red herrings" intended to distract from what they considered the central argument: development within 45 acres.
Baxter also questioned, during deliberations, whether the bid process was free of "some impropriety."
"The fact that everything says 45 acres and the winning bid says 64 acres ... that's the thing that sort of jumped out at me," he said.
Shealy says the authority intended all along to pick Linger Longer and that the surprise decision to accept its 64-acre proposal underscores the favoritism.
Baxter, after ruling in the state's favor, suggested the authority and Linger Longer slow the island's development until a higher court, if necessary, weighs in.
"That island is very special," the judge said. "All of those islands down there need to be protected."
Ed Boshears, an authority board member who attended the hearing, said Monday's ruling won't stem criticism of the state park's redevelopment.
"The authority needs to take heed of the judge's words and go very slowly," he said. "The process was fundamentally flawed, and the handling of it was not done in a proper manner. But the court has ruled based on the strict requirements of the law."
Judge rejects challenge by losing bidder for redevelopment deal on island.
By Dan Chapman
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/15/08
A Fulton County Superior Court judge on Monday allowed the large-scale redevelopment of Jekyll Island to go forward, turning back a challenge from a losing bidder who claimed the state unfairly awarded the contract.
Judge Jerry Baxter's ruling lets Linger Longer Communities continue with its $352 million condo-hotel-retail project in the state park near Brunswick. The Greensboro, Ga.-based developer plans 1,100 condo, hotel and time-share units fronting the Atlantic Ocean.
"Obviously we think the judge is correct on both grounds —- dismissing the complaint for lack of standing and denying the injunction for lack of merit," said Linger Longer attorney Emmet Bondurant, who argued alongside the counsel for the Jekyll Island Authority.
Wade Shealy Jr., whose company lost the bid, sued the authority after it awarded the contract in September. The Jekyll Island Authority and Linger Longer prevailed Monday when Baxter determined the process was fair. A disappointed Shealy said he'll likely appeal Baxter's decision to deny the injunction.
"It's not over. We still believe the process was flawed, and we want to see it done right," said Shealy, who spent $925,000 on his bid.
The crux of Monday's decision revolved around how many acres were in play. In its request for proposals last year, the authority stipulated eight times that the "town center" project would encompass 45 acres. Shealy's Jekyll Island Revitalization Group and Trammell Crow Co., another bidder, adhered to the 45-acre parameter.
Linger Longer, however, used 64 acres in its plan. By using fewer acres, Shealy said, the degree of green space and density —- two major selection criteria —- was unfairly skewed.
The authority disagreed. Its attorney, George Zier, testified Monday that the bid for the "town center" site was fluid and allowed for the construction of hotel and parking, for example, beyond the 45 acres.
"That was perfectly permissible from day one, page one," Zier said. The bid by Shealy and partners "imploded of their own volition, not by anything the authority did. . . . They lost fair and square."
Zier also questioned whether Shealy's group could secure sufficient financing for the large-scale development.
Shealy and his attorneys labeled questions over financing and "standing" —- whether his group could legally challenge the bid —- as "red herrings" intended to distract from what they considered the central argument: development within 45 acres.
Baxter also questioned, during deliberations, whether the bid process was free of "some impropriety."
"The fact that everything says 45 acres and the winning bid says 64 acres ... that's the thing that sort of jumped out at me," he said.
Shealy says the authority intended all along to pick Linger Longer and that the surprise decision to accept its 64-acre proposal underscores the favoritism.
Baxter, after ruling in the state's favor, suggested the authority and Linger Longer slow the island's development until a higher court, if necessary, weighs in.
"That island is very special," the judge said. "All of those islands down there need to be protected."
Ed Boshears, an authority board member who attended the hearing, said Monday's ruling won't stem criticism of the state park's redevelopment.
"The authority needs to take heed of the judge's words and go very slowly," he said. "The process was fundamentally flawed, and the handling of it was not done in a proper manner. But the court has ruled based on the strict requirements of the law."
01/14 - Ruling allows Jekyll redevelopment to move forward
ajc.com > Business
By DAN CHAPMAN
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/14/08
A Fulton County Superior Court on Monday allowed the big-scale redevelopment of Jekyll Island to go forward, turning back a challenge from a losing bidder who claimed the contract was unfairly awarded by the state.
Judge Jerry Baxter's ruling allows the Linger Longer Co. to continue with its $352 million condo-hotel-retail project in the state park near Brunswick. The Greensboro, Ga.-based developer plans 1,100 condo, hotel and time-share units fronting the Atlantic Ocean.
Wade Shealy Jr., whose company lost the bid, sued the island's governing body after it awarded the coveted redevelopment contract last September. The Jekyll Island Authority prevailed Monday when Judge Baxter determined the process was fair and that Linger Longer won the prize on its merits. Shealy said he'll likely appeal Baxter's decision.
In its request for proposals last year, the authority stipulated eight times that the "town center" project would encompass 45 acres. Shealy's Jekyll Island Revitalization Group and The Trammell Crow Co. adhered to the 45-acre parameter.
Linger Longer, however, used 64 acres in its plan. By using fewer acres, Shealy said, the degree of green space and density —- two major selection criteria —- was unfairly skewed.
The judge disagreed.
Shealy further contends that the authority violated state procurement law while engaging in "an arbitrary and capricious act." He claims the authority intended all along to pick Linger Longer and that the surprise decision to accept its 64-acre proposal —- when other bidders were under the impression that only 45 acres were in play —- underscores the favoritism.
"We're disappointed, but it's not over," Shealy said. "We believe the process was flawed. Our goal was to get a fair bid and that's still our goal."
Baxter, after ruling in the state's favor, suggested the authority and Linger Longer slow the island's development until a higher court, if necessary, weighs in.
"That island is very special," the judge said. "All of those islands down there need to be protected."
By DAN CHAPMAN
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/14/08
A Fulton County Superior Court on Monday allowed the big-scale redevelopment of Jekyll Island to go forward, turning back a challenge from a losing bidder who claimed the contract was unfairly awarded by the state.
Judge Jerry Baxter's ruling allows the Linger Longer Co. to continue with its $352 million condo-hotel-retail project in the state park near Brunswick. The Greensboro, Ga.-based developer plans 1,100 condo, hotel and time-share units fronting the Atlantic Ocean.
Wade Shealy Jr., whose company lost the bid, sued the island's governing body after it awarded the coveted redevelopment contract last September. The Jekyll Island Authority prevailed Monday when Judge Baxter determined the process was fair and that Linger Longer won the prize on its merits. Shealy said he'll likely appeal Baxter's decision.
In its request for proposals last year, the authority stipulated eight times that the "town center" project would encompass 45 acres. Shealy's Jekyll Island Revitalization Group and The Trammell Crow Co. adhered to the 45-acre parameter.
Linger Longer, however, used 64 acres in its plan. By using fewer acres, Shealy said, the degree of green space and density —- two major selection criteria —- was unfairly skewed.
The judge disagreed.
Shealy further contends that the authority violated state procurement law while engaging in "an arbitrary and capricious act." He claims the authority intended all along to pick Linger Longer and that the surprise decision to accept its 64-acre proposal —- when other bidders were under the impression that only 45 acres were in play —- underscores the favoritism.
"We're disappointed, but it's not over," Shealy said. "We believe the process was flawed. Our goal was to get a fair bid and that's still our goal."
Baxter, after ruling in the state's favor, suggested the authority and Linger Longer slow the island's development until a higher court, if necessary, weighs in.
"That island is very special," the judge said. "All of those islands down there need to be protected."
01/13 - Georgia governor asleep at the switch
ajc.com > Opinion
LETTERS
I can't say I was surprised to see columnist Jim Wooten ("Quick, costly solutions not Perdue's style," @issue, Jan. 8) making apologies for Gov. Sonny Perdue's lack of speedy leadership. And I've read his column enough to know that if Perdue were a Democrat, Wooten would be howling about our do-nothing governor.
But the guv must have hit a new low if Wooten feels the need to extol the virtues of having a governor asleep at the switch. Georgia is crying out for leadership on so many issues: water supply, transportation, education and even Jekyll Island. But where's Sonny? Perhaps gone fishing, but who really knows?
I hope we get some serious leadership soon, because like Humpty Dumpty, all the king's horses and all the king's men won't be able to put Georgia's growth egg back together again after it falls.
TOM ELLICOTT, Atlanta
MIKE LUCKOVICH / Staff
LETTERS
I can't say I was surprised to see columnist Jim Wooten ("Quick, costly solutions not Perdue's style," @issue, Jan. 8) making apologies for Gov. Sonny Perdue's lack of speedy leadership. And I've read his column enough to know that if Perdue were a Democrat, Wooten would be howling about our do-nothing governor.
But the guv must have hit a new low if Wooten feels the need to extol the virtues of having a governor asleep at the switch. Georgia is crying out for leadership on so many issues: water supply, transportation, education and even Jekyll Island. But where's Sonny? Perhaps gone fishing, but who really knows?
I hope we get some serious leadership soon, because like Humpty Dumpty, all the king's horses and all the king's men won't be able to put Georgia's growth egg back together again after it falls.
TOM ELLICOTT, Atlanta
MIKE LUCKOVICH / Staff
01/15 - Jekyll says judge clears plan
Date January 15, 2008
Section(s) Local News
The Brunswick News
The company challenging the bid awarded by the Jekyll Island Authority to Linger Longer Communities lost its legal battle Monday in Atlanta.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Jerry Baxter denied the injunction sought by the Jekyll Island Revitalization Group. The company filed suit in November, claiming the authority unfairly awarded the private partnership role to the Linger Longer Communities of Greensboro, N.C.
Jekyll Island Revitalization Group's bid ranked third.
Baxter disagreed, ruling that Jekyll Island Revitalization Group had no standing to sue, said Eric Garvey, senior marketing director for the Jekyll Island Authority.
Bob Krueger, chair of the Private Partner Selection Committee for the authority, said the ruling vindicates the process used.
"We are very confident and comfortable as a result with having unanimously selected Linger Longer Communities as our private-sector partner for the revitalization ahead," Krueger said.
That means Linger Longer Community can proceed with a final design of its proposed multi-million dollar revitalization of the state park's commercial district. The plan includes new hotels, convention center and shopping area, as well as condominiums.
"We are pleased that Judge Baxter agreed with the Jekyll Island Authority and our private-sector partner, Linger Longer Communities, and the process of improving and enhancing Georgia's Jewel will continue to move forward," said Ben Porter, chair of the Jekyll Island State Park Authorit
Section(s) Local News
The Brunswick News
The company challenging the bid awarded by the Jekyll Island Authority to Linger Longer Communities lost its legal battle Monday in Atlanta.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Jerry Baxter denied the injunction sought by the Jekyll Island Revitalization Group. The company filed suit in November, claiming the authority unfairly awarded the private partnership role to the Linger Longer Communities of Greensboro, N.C.
Jekyll Island Revitalization Group's bid ranked third.
Baxter disagreed, ruling that Jekyll Island Revitalization Group had no standing to sue, said Eric Garvey, senior marketing director for the Jekyll Island Authority.
Bob Krueger, chair of the Private Partner Selection Committee for the authority, said the ruling vindicates the process used.
"We are very confident and comfortable as a result with having unanimously selected Linger Longer Communities as our private-sector partner for the revitalization ahead," Krueger said.
That means Linger Longer Community can proceed with a final design of its proposed multi-million dollar revitalization of the state park's commercial district. The plan includes new hotels, convention center and shopping area, as well as condominiums.
"We are pleased that Judge Baxter agreed with the Jekyll Island Authority and our private-sector partner, Linger Longer Communities, and the process of improving and enhancing Georgia's Jewel will continue to move forward," said Ben Porter, chair of the Jekyll Island State Park Authorit
01/15 - New Executive Director, Jekyll Island Authority
Date January 15, 2008
Section(s) Letters
As the staff at Jekyll Island, facing the biggest change in the state park's nearly 70-year history, works with out a leader, it just occurred to me that the ideal Executive Direstor of the Jekyll Island Authority is right here in our very midst. He is also very available!
I must preface my recommendation with the admission that this position is embedded in politics, and the man at the helm of making this all-important appointment is Governor Sonny Perdue. Perdue is the consumate politician and his appointment may be sawyed more by political considerations than by what--or who--may be in the best interest of Jekyll Island.
The obvious man for the job is Brunswick Mayor Bryan Thompson. Thompson spent the last four years as the president and CEO of Blueprint Brunswick. This group set out to draw $150 million in investments to the Brunswick economy. At last count, Blueprint Brunswick has attrated close to $1.5 Billion. That's 10 times what was sought!
What are the stated goals at Jekyll Island? Facility improvements; Infrastructure upgrades; Affordability; Environmetal stability; Attracting more visitors; and Financial Independence. What did Thompson accomplished as the head of Blueprint Brunswick? Exactly what you see listed above.
Some will say that as Brunswick Mayor, he shouldn't hold both posts. Perhaps so, but Jekyll Island Director of Human Resources Cornell Harvey is also a Brunswick City Commissioner, and has handled both jobs very well without any noticeable conflict. I am sure if Thompson were to accept the Jekyll Island position, he would resign as mayor anyway.
Thompson and Jekyll Island seem to me to be a perfect match. He knows how to lead, how to produce and manage growth, and Jekyll needs solid, experienced leadership, not some political hack who just happens to have friends in the "right places."
I hope the Governor and the Jekyll Island Authority Board will give Thompson the serious consideration he deserves. Jekyll Island needs and deserves an executive director of his abilities.
Charles E. McCord
Brunswick, GA
Section(s) Letters
As the staff at Jekyll Island, facing the biggest change in the state park's nearly 70-year history, works with out a leader, it just occurred to me that the ideal Executive Direstor of the Jekyll Island Authority is right here in our very midst. He is also very available!
I must preface my recommendation with the admission that this position is embedded in politics, and the man at the helm of making this all-important appointment is Governor Sonny Perdue. Perdue is the consumate politician and his appointment may be sawyed more by political considerations than by what--or who--may be in the best interest of Jekyll Island.
The obvious man for the job is Brunswick Mayor Bryan Thompson. Thompson spent the last four years as the president and CEO of Blueprint Brunswick. This group set out to draw $150 million in investments to the Brunswick economy. At last count, Blueprint Brunswick has attrated close to $1.5 Billion. That's 10 times what was sought!
What are the stated goals at Jekyll Island? Facility improvements; Infrastructure upgrades; Affordability; Environmetal stability; Attracting more visitors; and Financial Independence. What did Thompson accomplished as the head of Blueprint Brunswick? Exactly what you see listed above.
Some will say that as Brunswick Mayor, he shouldn't hold both posts. Perhaps so, but Jekyll Island Director of Human Resources Cornell Harvey is also a Brunswick City Commissioner, and has handled both jobs very well without any noticeable conflict. I am sure if Thompson were to accept the Jekyll Island position, he would resign as mayor anyway.
Thompson and Jekyll Island seem to me to be a perfect match. He knows how to lead, how to produce and manage growth, and Jekyll needs solid, experienced leadership, not some political hack who just happens to have friends in the "right places."
I hope the Governor and the Jekyll Island Authority Board will give Thompson the serious consideration he deserves. Jekyll Island needs and deserves an executive director of his abilities.
Charles E. McCord
Brunswick, GA
01/14 - Letters: Jekyll Island
Date January 14, 2008
Section(s )Letters
The Brunswick News
Sen. Jeff Chapman speaks for a majority of Georgians who are displeased with how Linger Longer was chosen to 'revamp' Jekyll, displeased with their proposed plans that will NOT be affordable to all Georgians, displeased that they will reap profits and incentives from a State Park for which we pay taxes,displeased with the political influences that surround this situation, and surprised that people of even minimal intelligence cannot see through this sham! As for people 'trekking' to other beaches ...if you want nightlife and the actions that go along with this style, then you don't want Jekyll...a state park of peace, quiet, nature, wildlife and other God-given gifts.
Respectfully submitted,
Carol Sue Ravenel
Roswell, GA
I have read the editorial in the January 11, 2008 edition and the accompanying article by Jim Langford concerning the proposed development of Jekyll Island. There has been a lot of rhetoric on this project since it & iacute;s inception.
Some folks seem to be against any development & ntilde; THAT AIN & iacute;T GONNA HAPPEN. The new hotels will be built. A new convention center and a new attached convention hotel will be built. While they didn & iacute;t ask me it seems like a very reasonable location. The village center will be built somewhere close to the convention center. Whether it is on the beach or back off the beach probably should still be open for discussion.
The big item that seems to be problematic is the usurping of the public parking. I have seen the statistics of 1 minute, 2 minute and 3 minute parking for beach access. In my opinion, ready access to the beach means 1 à minutes to the beach. When the public comes to the beach, families show up with 3 kids, two beach chairs, a cooler and maybe a beach umbrella. They don & iacute;t need to be parked on a street parking lot and try to lug all this paraphernalia down to the waters edge. The existing beach access just north of the Days Inn hosts the beach festival and other public gatherings. This area could be extended north into the area where the current convention center is to be demolished to provide parking when the existing parking lot north of the convention center is abolished. It could be environmentally friendly and using the & igrave;porous surfaces & icirc; Jim Langford speaks of. If I interpret all the information correctly this area will be filled with hotels and condos in the future. That is probably the & igrave;wooly bugger & icirc; in this & igrave;BRILLIANT & icirc; plan.
I have seen many a large project outlined for construction. I have yet to see one come out with an opening plan that doesn & iacute;t get worked over until it is even a better plan. This plan still needs some work.
Ross F. Miller
Jekyll Island
I was alarmed to read the Commentary section attacking Senator Chapman's resolution concerning Jekyll Island. I applaud any senator who voices concern when the people's resources are being bid out and developed for profit.
I have worked in the tourism industry for many years, in fact I studied Heritage Tourism in college. I also lived in Savannah, Georgia for many years. We saw when companies began to see Bay Street as a gold mine. Within the last few years, many chains built hotels on empty parking lots or dilapidates sites. Now there are big beautiful hotels all along Bay Street. But was it necessary? No it was not.
The result of all of these hotels was that the existing hotels had to increase their prices to keep profits at the same levels. Now a family wanting to stay in downtown Savannah cannot afford it. Most average citizens stay outside of the historic district and drive in. The solution was to increase the amount of conventions. Convention Attendees are in meetings all day and venture out little. Now instead of having hotels full of families filling their days with activities, we have hundreds of people being held captive in a hotel,maybe spending one day on the town.
I am a tour guide, so I can see past the bed tax numbers the City of Savannah is receiving. Businesses are caving, tour companies are crying, museums are starving. So what is going to happen to Jekyll? Everyone agrees that the hotels need to be updated, but the Linger Longer plan is unnecessary and will complicate tourism to the island in the long run. According to the georgia.org, Jekyll Island is categorized under the 'Hidden Gems' list. It states that 'Georgia is a great place to unwind,refresh,and invigorate.' Why would anyone want to accomplish those goals by fighting for parking around a 'green space', walking half a mile from their parking spot just to see the beach,and paying an outrageous hotel price and parking fees?
A plan to update Jekyll is needed, but condominiums and expensive hotels blocking our beach access will hinder rather than help us.
Missy Brandt
Darien, Ga
The recent editorials concerning developement on Jekyll island are amount to nothing more than a vicious attack on Senator Chapman and reveal a complete lack of understanding of the unique nature and value of Jekyll Island. The News welcomes a return to the islands 'heyday', which did not include any of the things that Linger Longer proposes. The draw of Jekyll Island is the beach and the fact that it is not spoiled by too much commercial or residetial developement. Condos and shopping are not needed to draw more visitors, a strong marketing plan that showcases the unique qualities that Jekyll posess's, pesenting it as a natural alternative to other overcrowded over developed destinations would bring more visitors. The facilities that are in place now need only to be updated and remodeled and all would be well. Jekyll is a rare and fragile natural resource unlike any other the state of Georgia owns, why turn it into just another unremarkable spot on the coast? The greed of a few real estate developers that why.
Paul Patterson
Gurley, Alabama
Dear Mr Langford -
Being experienced sorts, we always look a 'gift horse' in the mouth. We are rarely disappointed by finding nothing interesting.
1. Restore or Revitalize Jekyll -
We see no need to do anything : It suits us fine just the way it is, except as noted below.
2. Residential Development -
There is no need for further residential development of ANY sort on Jekyll. What exists now is obviously the product of some political boondoggle in the past of the same nature as what Linger Longer is trying to advance now.
What is more, over time, the residences now present on Jekyll should be gradually ELIMINATED -- They should be bought and bulldozed by a private charitable trust whenever they come up for sale, purchased at a proper -- not a firesale -- valuation.
3. Public Acces Will in Fact be Impacted -- Grossly -
The idea of scattering the public parking lots thruout the development is an inspired move -- a clever trick -- on LL's part.
Should this development actually take place (God Forbid), a few years down the road, the residents whose properties are adjacent to public parking areas (which includes almost all of them) will complain vigorously to the State and the County that their peace is being disturbed by the endless stream of outsider beach users running about the lots, walkways and streets of the development. They will insist that these parking lots therefore be closed and our dutiful politicians will of course accomodate them with a knowing, sly grin. This will provide space for a number of new infill residences of one kind or another.
We do not trust Linger Longer and we do not trust the politicians of the State nor of the County : We have no reason to do so (*). What will happen will be what you have already privately planned with the politicians, with, we are sure, the distribution of appropriate honoraria disguised as 'consulting fees'.
Even were we in favor of this project, we would demand IRON BOUND contracts and tens of millions of dollars in performance bonds from ALL parties involved, a provision that LL would doubtlessly decline.
(*) Consider, for examnple, the Craig Field Airport controversy in Jacksonville and the dishonorable behavior of Jacksonville's mayor in this matter.
Mr Langford, we do not know about all of our Brunswick neighbors, but WE were not born yesterday.
Incidentally, as a girl, Loretta used to visit the ruins of Jekyll with her father when it was, indeed, all a shambles.
Allen & amp; Loretta Wollscheidt
Brunswick, GA
Jekyll Island Project,
My comments and then a solution to this problem is this, I think the whole project is just to close to the beach and they do not allow traffic to drive staight through next to the beach. You have to go about 2 miles around to get to the other side. That to me takes away the beauty and enjoyment of a lovely scenic drive next to the beach. I saw the maps of the project and it shows that as soon as you get on Jekyll Island that all you see now is a detour to the right or left to go around the project and a bunch of buildings and trees everywhere. This to me is just one step closer to being just like Sea Island, where now they have guard gates and no public is free to come in. Sea Island did have public beaches but now you can not go to them unless you pay to stay at the hotels over there. That to me is taking away the freedom of the public access and giving it to the rich. That is wrong and Jekyll Island can become just like this too one day. My solution to Jekyll Island is this, I think that there should be a two way street, with palm trees in the middle, straight to the beach and parking on both sides at an angle. Then I think there should be a two way street next to the beach all the way through the project, with palm trees in the middle, and have parking at an angle on both sides. Then there can be plenty of access parking and if you want to just drive and see the beautiful beach, you can. In other words, I think their whole project should be back away from the beach about 40 yards or 120 feet and allow the access of the public to have their freedom to the beach still without pushing back their project to far from the beach also. This will be great for everyone's enjoyment and freedom of public access close to the beach.
Wayne Rhodes
Brunswick, GA
I never thought The Brunswick News would let a corporation write its editorial - but I must say - your 1/11/08 editorial sounds like a clone from Linger Longer with added touches by certain legislators who really are all about the money!! They never tell the public that the JIA is still operating with a profit and that the "old" Convention Center is full much of the time and used most of the time. They don't own up to the last 4+ years of "purposeful neglect" of the facilities on the island - or that indeed, the JIA was/is responsible for seeing that hotels on the island keep in shape or lose their leases.
And Linger Longer's spokesman, Jim Langford, maintains that their plan is "fluid' - but if that is true - why is he so defensive about every inch of that overbearing plan?
By the way - isn't WATER a big problem in this state of ours? Why is the new Canopy Bluff Hotel being allowed to build 5 swimming pools with their complex? Ask the JIA.
And is there enuf water/infrastructure/etc. on Jekyll, and in good enuf condition, to withstand 5000 people per day or more? The JIA may say yes - but they know better. Don't let anyone kid you - the proposed development on JI is all about the money -- for a few. Not about a re-vitalization of the State Park's facilities.
Do not disparage our State Senator Jeff Chapman and please stop misquoting him. He is doing his job in trying to represent the people and protect Jekyll Island State Park.
Jean Poleszak
Jekyll Island, GA
I was astonished by the vitriol and meanness present in your editorial criticizing Senator Chapman for soliciting input from the citizens of Georgia regarding plans for Jekyll Island.
The editorial sounds amazingly like a hatchet job against Senator Chapman.
A reasonable editorial would have acknowledged Senator Chapman's pivotal role in saving the south end of Jekyll Island from development by unanimous vote in last year's legislative session.
A reasonable editorial would have acknowledged that there are literally thousands of Georgia citizens who do not agree with your position that putting a 64 acre resort-style development consisting of hundreds of hotel rooms, condos and shops on the beach of Jekyll Island State Park is a good thing. There have been many well reasoned editorials and commentary in many papers throughout this state and Florida discussing the issue. But I have never seen such stridency and mean-spiritedness anywhere else.
A reasonable editorial would not cast Senator Chapman in the position of seeming to call Governor Perdue, and legislative leaders liars. He has never done that. Reasonable people can disagree. Politicians can disagree. Senator Chapman may be disagreeing with these political leaders on this issue, but that is what our democracy is all about. Or am is mistaken, and someone has changed the rules about political discourse in this country?
Or are we to accept that our leaders are infallible and know without a doubt what is best for us? That sounds very un-American to me.
A reasonable editorial would have examinined the recent history of Jekyll Island, and noted the various factors contributing to the decline in visitors. Three of the major hotels are demolished. They are to be rebuilt. Visitors will increase when they are rebuilt. That seems simple enough. With the hotels replaced there will be a return to the "heyday" of Jekyll, apart from the issue of the Linger Longer project.
One can only wonder at the reason for such editorial stridency and one-sidedness from a major state newspaper.
Joan Lardin
Hawkinsville, GA
I was dismayed to read your commentary on Jan. 11, 2008, and about Jeff Chapman and Jekyll Island. I have been closely following the development situation on Jekyll Island. I have yet to meet anyone in Georgia who is in favor of the current Linger Longer development plans. Developers and the JIA, apparently out of touch with the citizens of Georgia, see these plans as positive. These plans will rob sea turtles of their nesting sites, cost Georgia taxpayers millions of dollars for infrastructure, and in the end the average Georgian would not be able to afford the condos, timeshares and hotels they paid for. Of course Jim Langford as a developer posed to make a fortune is in favor of the development plans. I applaud Jeff Chapman's efforts to protect the last remaining barrier island of Georgia. Sensible ecology friendly development can and should be done. Georgia and Georgians will benefit from this. Jeff Chapman realizes that Jekyll Island is the Jewel of Georgia.
Robin Revennaugh
The cover of Linger Longer;s brochure reads,
REDISCOVER AN OLD FRIEND.....JEKYLL ISLAND
It should read,
WE LOSE OUR OLD FRIEND...JEKYLL ISLAND
We did come to the island as children and remember the excitement of crossing the bridge and the thrill of seeing the ocean. Then the race would begin, as we would spring from the family car to see who could be the first to jump into the ocean. Our parents would follow with wagons of toys, dogs on leashes, coolers, umbrellas and everything imaginable to make our special day at the beach complete.
And yes, even to this day I come with my grandchildren and see the same delight in their eyes. Jekyll's unique environment has survived since the 16th century due to those who have left their mark carefully so as to preserve the island's precious resources. And so.... for it to always continue, it was declared a "state park" in 1971 so as to preserve our island for all who wish to come for a day or a week and bask in the glory of nature on our own golden jewel.
It is hard for man's creations to weather on an island over time. And, yes the island's hotels and recreational facilities need sprucing and refurbishing and or re-built but not to the extent that Linger Longer wants. Their proposal calls for all beachfront condos, hotels, shops, restaurants, and a new huge convention center to be built along nearly the entire span of our state park's beautiful beach and thusly will eliminate our four beachside public parking lots. But... for those of us who want to come for the day, Linger Longer Development promises to provide us beach access via walking paths between buildings with parking lots located way too far for us and our little ones along with their grandparents to walk to the beach. And.... sadly, all of these "beachfront accommodations" that they plan to build will be not affordable to all who wish to come for an extended stay during the summer season. Oh yes, maybe we can come and vacation during the winter when the hotel rates will drop and therefore will be more affordable in the off-season.
This development by Linger Longer represents a huge monetary gain for the developer along with the politicians who orchestrated the present redevelopment plan of Jekyll.
What will have happen to our beautiful dunes and our island's beachfront habitat? They cannot survive, as they were never meant to be replaced with miles of buildings and beach venues. Our turtles, birds and wildlife will lose their beloved island, as we will all.... Our legacy will be gone forever and so will all the past and future memories of all those who have and would had visited our precious jewel..... Jekyll Island.
Mardi Brooks
Brunswick, Georgia
Dear Editor,
I must confess that I am confused. In your January 11 editorial about Sen. Chapman's opposition to the Linger Longer development plans for Jekyll Island you mention that Jekyll has been in need of "apparatus to rescue distressed swimmers" and "funding to make repairs to the wave pool at Summer Waves waterpark." I have not seen the plan as submitted by Linger Longer, but from what I have read, it does not address these issues. So far as I know, it also does not address the serious dune erosion problem. You must be seeing something in the Linger Longer proposal that will address these needs that I am not seeing, and I would truly appreciate knowing about this part of the proposal.
I have been a regular visitor to Jekyll Island for the last 15 to 20 years, first while I was a GA resident for nearly 50 years and now as a MA resident, working on a Ph.D. I still return to Jekyll Island annually. For many years even before they were torn down I refused to stay at the hotels. They were not well maintained, and the last time I stayed in one they were not well staffed either. I have rented a cottage each summer for over 10 years. There seems to be very little decline in cottage rental; I still must make August reservations not later than May to get the cottage accommodation that I want. I'm not sure where the tourism decline figure originated, but it apparently did not originate from the folks who rent out cottages.
Jekyll Island clearly needs some hotels to replace those that were demolished. To say, however, that a resort development along the ecologically fragile stretch of beach where Linger Longer wants to put an upscale resort is what Jekyll needs seems to be quite a stretch. Given that Sen. Chapman and his constituency actually live on Jekyll Island or at least nearby, their thoughts on what is needed for Jekyll Island take into consideration some identified needs that Linger Longer apparently has not yet recognized or made plans to address. Perhaps Linger Longer is more aware of the needs of coastal areas in North Carolina; they don't seem to be as well informed about the needs of Jekyll Island, GA.
Susan L. DeHoff
Shrewsbury, MA
"Since 1990, visitation on the island has dropped - no, plunge is more like it - by an alarming 47 percent." The Brunswick News 1/11/08
I don't know the basis for the oft quoted 47% reduction in our visitors. It could be based on hotel count which is down.
Perhaps a more relevant count is the toll booth revenue which shows little variation from FY94 to FY06.
Parking revenue and Visitors at $2.00 per entry
FY94 FY95 FY96
643,909 665,399 618,520
321,955 332,700 309,260
and revenue/visitors at $3.00 per entry
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06
PARTIAL EST
1,171,994 1,138,404 1,105,729 1,074,157 1,123,428
390,665 379,468 368,576 358,052 374,476
These data come from the JIA annual budget report.
FY05, FO6, and FY07 should be updated.
Lucien DeBacker
Jekyll Island, Georgia
Section(s )Letters
The Brunswick News
Sen. Jeff Chapman speaks for a majority of Georgians who are displeased with how Linger Longer was chosen to 'revamp' Jekyll, displeased with their proposed plans that will NOT be affordable to all Georgians, displeased that they will reap profits and incentives from a State Park for which we pay taxes,displeased with the political influences that surround this situation, and surprised that people of even minimal intelligence cannot see through this sham! As for people 'trekking' to other beaches ...if you want nightlife and the actions that go along with this style, then you don't want Jekyll...a state park of peace, quiet, nature, wildlife and other God-given gifts.
Respectfully submitted,
Carol Sue Ravenel
Roswell, GA
I have read the editorial in the January 11, 2008 edition and the accompanying article by Jim Langford concerning the proposed development of Jekyll Island. There has been a lot of rhetoric on this project since it & iacute;s inception.
Some folks seem to be against any development & ntilde; THAT AIN & iacute;T GONNA HAPPEN. The new hotels will be built. A new convention center and a new attached convention hotel will be built. While they didn & iacute;t ask me it seems like a very reasonable location. The village center will be built somewhere close to the convention center. Whether it is on the beach or back off the beach probably should still be open for discussion.
The big item that seems to be problematic is the usurping of the public parking. I have seen the statistics of 1 minute, 2 minute and 3 minute parking for beach access. In my opinion, ready access to the beach means 1 à minutes to the beach. When the public comes to the beach, families show up with 3 kids, two beach chairs, a cooler and maybe a beach umbrella. They don & iacute;t need to be parked on a street parking lot and try to lug all this paraphernalia down to the waters edge. The existing beach access just north of the Days Inn hosts the beach festival and other public gatherings. This area could be extended north into the area where the current convention center is to be demolished to provide parking when the existing parking lot north of the convention center is abolished. It could be environmentally friendly and using the & igrave;porous surfaces & icirc; Jim Langford speaks of. If I interpret all the information correctly this area will be filled with hotels and condos in the future. That is probably the & igrave;wooly bugger & icirc; in this & igrave;BRILLIANT & icirc; plan.
I have seen many a large project outlined for construction. I have yet to see one come out with an opening plan that doesn & iacute;t get worked over until it is even a better plan. This plan still needs some work.
Ross F. Miller
Jekyll Island
I was alarmed to read the Commentary section attacking Senator Chapman's resolution concerning Jekyll Island. I applaud any senator who voices concern when the people's resources are being bid out and developed for profit.
I have worked in the tourism industry for many years, in fact I studied Heritage Tourism in college. I also lived in Savannah, Georgia for many years. We saw when companies began to see Bay Street as a gold mine. Within the last few years, many chains built hotels on empty parking lots or dilapidates sites. Now there are big beautiful hotels all along Bay Street. But was it necessary? No it was not.
The result of all of these hotels was that the existing hotels had to increase their prices to keep profits at the same levels. Now a family wanting to stay in downtown Savannah cannot afford it. Most average citizens stay outside of the historic district and drive in. The solution was to increase the amount of conventions. Convention Attendees are in meetings all day and venture out little. Now instead of having hotels full of families filling their days with activities, we have hundreds of people being held captive in a hotel,maybe spending one day on the town.
I am a tour guide, so I can see past the bed tax numbers the City of Savannah is receiving. Businesses are caving, tour companies are crying, museums are starving. So what is going to happen to Jekyll? Everyone agrees that the hotels need to be updated, but the Linger Longer plan is unnecessary and will complicate tourism to the island in the long run. According to the georgia.org, Jekyll Island is categorized under the 'Hidden Gems' list. It states that 'Georgia is a great place to unwind,refresh,and invigorate.' Why would anyone want to accomplish those goals by fighting for parking around a 'green space', walking half a mile from their parking spot just to see the beach,and paying an outrageous hotel price and parking fees?
A plan to update Jekyll is needed, but condominiums and expensive hotels blocking our beach access will hinder rather than help us.
Missy Brandt
Darien, Ga
The recent editorials concerning developement on Jekyll island are amount to nothing more than a vicious attack on Senator Chapman and reveal a complete lack of understanding of the unique nature and value of Jekyll Island. The News welcomes a return to the islands 'heyday', which did not include any of the things that Linger Longer proposes. The draw of Jekyll Island is the beach and the fact that it is not spoiled by too much commercial or residetial developement. Condos and shopping are not needed to draw more visitors, a strong marketing plan that showcases the unique qualities that Jekyll posess's, pesenting it as a natural alternative to other overcrowded over developed destinations would bring more visitors. The facilities that are in place now need only to be updated and remodeled and all would be well. Jekyll is a rare and fragile natural resource unlike any other the state of Georgia owns, why turn it into just another unremarkable spot on the coast? The greed of a few real estate developers that why.
Paul Patterson
Gurley, Alabama
Dear Mr Langford -
Being experienced sorts, we always look a 'gift horse' in the mouth. We are rarely disappointed by finding nothing interesting.
1. Restore or Revitalize Jekyll -
We see no need to do anything : It suits us fine just the way it is, except as noted below.
2. Residential Development -
There is no need for further residential development of ANY sort on Jekyll. What exists now is obviously the product of some political boondoggle in the past of the same nature as what Linger Longer is trying to advance now.
What is more, over time, the residences now present on Jekyll should be gradually ELIMINATED -- They should be bought and bulldozed by a private charitable trust whenever they come up for sale, purchased at a proper -- not a firesale -- valuation.
3. Public Acces Will in Fact be Impacted -- Grossly -
The idea of scattering the public parking lots thruout the development is an inspired move -- a clever trick -- on LL's part.
Should this development actually take place (God Forbid), a few years down the road, the residents whose properties are adjacent to public parking areas (which includes almost all of them) will complain vigorously to the State and the County that their peace is being disturbed by the endless stream of outsider beach users running about the lots, walkways and streets of the development. They will insist that these parking lots therefore be closed and our dutiful politicians will of course accomodate them with a knowing, sly grin. This will provide space for a number of new infill residences of one kind or another.
We do not trust Linger Longer and we do not trust the politicians of the State nor of the County : We have no reason to do so (*). What will happen will be what you have already privately planned with the politicians, with, we are sure, the distribution of appropriate honoraria disguised as 'consulting fees'.
Even were we in favor of this project, we would demand IRON BOUND contracts and tens of millions of dollars in performance bonds from ALL parties involved, a provision that LL would doubtlessly decline.
(*) Consider, for examnple, the Craig Field Airport controversy in Jacksonville and the dishonorable behavior of Jacksonville's mayor in this matter.
Mr Langford, we do not know about all of our Brunswick neighbors, but WE were not born yesterday.
Incidentally, as a girl, Loretta used to visit the ruins of Jekyll with her father when it was, indeed, all a shambles.
Allen & amp; Loretta Wollscheidt
Brunswick, GA
Jekyll Island Project,
My comments and then a solution to this problem is this, I think the whole project is just to close to the beach and they do not allow traffic to drive staight through next to the beach. You have to go about 2 miles around to get to the other side. That to me takes away the beauty and enjoyment of a lovely scenic drive next to the beach. I saw the maps of the project and it shows that as soon as you get on Jekyll Island that all you see now is a detour to the right or left to go around the project and a bunch of buildings and trees everywhere. This to me is just one step closer to being just like Sea Island, where now they have guard gates and no public is free to come in. Sea Island did have public beaches but now you can not go to them unless you pay to stay at the hotels over there. That to me is taking away the freedom of the public access and giving it to the rich. That is wrong and Jekyll Island can become just like this too one day. My solution to Jekyll Island is this, I think that there should be a two way street, with palm trees in the middle, straight to the beach and parking on both sides at an angle. Then I think there should be a two way street next to the beach all the way through the project, with palm trees in the middle, and have parking at an angle on both sides. Then there can be plenty of access parking and if you want to just drive and see the beautiful beach, you can. In other words, I think their whole project should be back away from the beach about 40 yards or 120 feet and allow the access of the public to have their freedom to the beach still without pushing back their project to far from the beach also. This will be great for everyone's enjoyment and freedom of public access close to the beach.
Wayne Rhodes
Brunswick, GA
I never thought The Brunswick News would let a corporation write its editorial - but I must say - your 1/11/08 editorial sounds like a clone from Linger Longer with added touches by certain legislators who really are all about the money!! They never tell the public that the JIA is still operating with a profit and that the "old" Convention Center is full much of the time and used most of the time. They don't own up to the last 4+ years of "purposeful neglect" of the facilities on the island - or that indeed, the JIA was/is responsible for seeing that hotels on the island keep in shape or lose their leases.
And Linger Longer's spokesman, Jim Langford, maintains that their plan is "fluid' - but if that is true - why is he so defensive about every inch of that overbearing plan?
By the way - isn't WATER a big problem in this state of ours? Why is the new Canopy Bluff Hotel being allowed to build 5 swimming pools with their complex? Ask the JIA.
And is there enuf water/infrastructure/etc. on Jekyll, and in good enuf condition, to withstand 5000 people per day or more? The JIA may say yes - but they know better. Don't let anyone kid you - the proposed development on JI is all about the money -- for a few. Not about a re-vitalization of the State Park's facilities.
Do not disparage our State Senator Jeff Chapman and please stop misquoting him. He is doing his job in trying to represent the people and protect Jekyll Island State Park.
Jean Poleszak
Jekyll Island, GA
I was astonished by the vitriol and meanness present in your editorial criticizing Senator Chapman for soliciting input from the citizens of Georgia regarding plans for Jekyll Island.
The editorial sounds amazingly like a hatchet job against Senator Chapman.
A reasonable editorial would have acknowledged Senator Chapman's pivotal role in saving the south end of Jekyll Island from development by unanimous vote in last year's legislative session.
A reasonable editorial would have acknowledged that there are literally thousands of Georgia citizens who do not agree with your position that putting a 64 acre resort-style development consisting of hundreds of hotel rooms, condos and shops on the beach of Jekyll Island State Park is a good thing. There have been many well reasoned editorials and commentary in many papers throughout this state and Florida discussing the issue. But I have never seen such stridency and mean-spiritedness anywhere else.
A reasonable editorial would not cast Senator Chapman in the position of seeming to call Governor Perdue, and legislative leaders liars. He has never done that. Reasonable people can disagree. Politicians can disagree. Senator Chapman may be disagreeing with these political leaders on this issue, but that is what our democracy is all about. Or am is mistaken, and someone has changed the rules about political discourse in this country?
Or are we to accept that our leaders are infallible and know without a doubt what is best for us? That sounds very un-American to me.
A reasonable editorial would have examinined the recent history of Jekyll Island, and noted the various factors contributing to the decline in visitors. Three of the major hotels are demolished. They are to be rebuilt. Visitors will increase when they are rebuilt. That seems simple enough. With the hotels replaced there will be a return to the "heyday" of Jekyll, apart from the issue of the Linger Longer project.
One can only wonder at the reason for such editorial stridency and one-sidedness from a major state newspaper.
Joan Lardin
Hawkinsville, GA
I was dismayed to read your commentary on Jan. 11, 2008, and about Jeff Chapman and Jekyll Island. I have been closely following the development situation on Jekyll Island. I have yet to meet anyone in Georgia who is in favor of the current Linger Longer development plans. Developers and the JIA, apparently out of touch with the citizens of Georgia, see these plans as positive. These plans will rob sea turtles of their nesting sites, cost Georgia taxpayers millions of dollars for infrastructure, and in the end the average Georgian would not be able to afford the condos, timeshares and hotels they paid for. Of course Jim Langford as a developer posed to make a fortune is in favor of the development plans. I applaud Jeff Chapman's efforts to protect the last remaining barrier island of Georgia. Sensible ecology friendly development can and should be done. Georgia and Georgians will benefit from this. Jeff Chapman realizes that Jekyll Island is the Jewel of Georgia.
Robin Revennaugh
The cover of Linger Longer;s brochure reads,
REDISCOVER AN OLD FRIEND.....JEKYLL ISLAND
It should read,
WE LOSE OUR OLD FRIEND...JEKYLL ISLAND
We did come to the island as children and remember the excitement of crossing the bridge and the thrill of seeing the ocean. Then the race would begin, as we would spring from the family car to see who could be the first to jump into the ocean. Our parents would follow with wagons of toys, dogs on leashes, coolers, umbrellas and everything imaginable to make our special day at the beach complete.
And yes, even to this day I come with my grandchildren and see the same delight in their eyes. Jekyll's unique environment has survived since the 16th century due to those who have left their mark carefully so as to preserve the island's precious resources. And so.... for it to always continue, it was declared a "state park" in 1971 so as to preserve our island for all who wish to come for a day or a week and bask in the glory of nature on our own golden jewel.
It is hard for man's creations to weather on an island over time. And, yes the island's hotels and recreational facilities need sprucing and refurbishing and or re-built but not to the extent that Linger Longer wants. Their proposal calls for all beachfront condos, hotels, shops, restaurants, and a new huge convention center to be built along nearly the entire span of our state park's beautiful beach and thusly will eliminate our four beachside public parking lots. But... for those of us who want to come for the day, Linger Longer Development promises to provide us beach access via walking paths between buildings with parking lots located way too far for us and our little ones along with their grandparents to walk to the beach. And.... sadly, all of these "beachfront accommodations" that they plan to build will be not affordable to all who wish to come for an extended stay during the summer season. Oh yes, maybe we can come and vacation during the winter when the hotel rates will drop and therefore will be more affordable in the off-season.
This development by Linger Longer represents a huge monetary gain for the developer along with the politicians who orchestrated the present redevelopment plan of Jekyll.
What will have happen to our beautiful dunes and our island's beachfront habitat? They cannot survive, as they were never meant to be replaced with miles of buildings and beach venues. Our turtles, birds and wildlife will lose their beloved island, as we will all.... Our legacy will be gone forever and so will all the past and future memories of all those who have and would had visited our precious jewel..... Jekyll Island.
Mardi Brooks
Brunswick, Georgia
Dear Editor,
I must confess that I am confused. In your January 11 editorial about Sen. Chapman's opposition to the Linger Longer development plans for Jekyll Island you mention that Jekyll has been in need of "apparatus to rescue distressed swimmers" and "funding to make repairs to the wave pool at Summer Waves waterpark." I have not seen the plan as submitted by Linger Longer, but from what I have read, it does not address these issues. So far as I know, it also does not address the serious dune erosion problem. You must be seeing something in the Linger Longer proposal that will address these needs that I am not seeing, and I would truly appreciate knowing about this part of the proposal.
I have been a regular visitor to Jekyll Island for the last 15 to 20 years, first while I was a GA resident for nearly 50 years and now as a MA resident, working on a Ph.D. I still return to Jekyll Island annually. For many years even before they were torn down I refused to stay at the hotels. They were not well maintained, and the last time I stayed in one they were not well staffed either. I have rented a cottage each summer for over 10 years. There seems to be very little decline in cottage rental; I still must make August reservations not later than May to get the cottage accommodation that I want. I'm not sure where the tourism decline figure originated, but it apparently did not originate from the folks who rent out cottages.
Jekyll Island clearly needs some hotels to replace those that were demolished. To say, however, that a resort development along the ecologically fragile stretch of beach where Linger Longer wants to put an upscale resort is what Jekyll needs seems to be quite a stretch. Given that Sen. Chapman and his constituency actually live on Jekyll Island or at least nearby, their thoughts on what is needed for Jekyll Island take into consideration some identified needs that Linger Longer apparently has not yet recognized or made plans to address. Perhaps Linger Longer is more aware of the needs of coastal areas in North Carolina; they don't seem to be as well informed about the needs of Jekyll Island, GA.
Susan L. DeHoff
Shrewsbury, MA
"Since 1990, visitation on the island has dropped - no, plunge is more like it - by an alarming 47 percent." The Brunswick News 1/11/08
I don't know the basis for the oft quoted 47% reduction in our visitors. It could be based on hotel count which is down.
Perhaps a more relevant count is the toll booth revenue which shows little variation from FY94 to FY06.
Parking revenue and Visitors at $2.00 per entry
FY94 FY95 FY96
643,909 665,399 618,520
321,955 332,700 309,260
and revenue/visitors at $3.00 per entry
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06
PARTIAL EST
1,171,994 1,138,404 1,105,729 1,074,157 1,123,428
390,665 379,468 368,576 358,052 374,476
These data come from the JIA annual budget report.
FY05, FO6, and FY07 should be updated.
Lucien DeBacker
Jekyll Island, Georgia
01/16 - Jekyll plan gains support
Date January 16, 2008
Section(s) Local News
By BRANDEE THOMAS
The Brunswick News
ATLANTA - Calling Jekyll Island a "tarnished jewel," the chair of the Glynn County Commission told overseers of the state park Tuesday that the commission is backing efforts to revitalize it.
"The Glynn County Commission would like to endorse what the (Jekyll Island) Authority is doing," Commission Chair Don Hogan told the authority during its meeting at the Coverdell Legislative Building.
"Jekyll Island is a tarnished jewel for the state of Georgia and it's time that jewel was polished," Hogan said.
Hogan was among 75 community leaders and citizens from Glynn County who attended the meeting of the Jekyll Island Authority board to show support for redevelopment plans. Others made the trip to oppose them.
The Jekyll Island board this past autumn approved a $440 million project outlined by Linger Longer Communities of Greensboro, N.C., to construct new hotels, condominiums, convention center and shopping area on about 60 acres near the waterfront. Linger Longer is the authority's private sector partner in the redevelopment.
Support for the project came from representatives of both the public and private sectors Tuesday.
"Linger Longer has done a great job," said Bruce Dixon, chair of the Brunswick-Golden Isles Chamber of Commerce. "We all want to do our part to protect the environment and this is a great marriage between (the private sector) and the state."
The meeting came just one day after a Fulton County Superior Court judge denied a request by Jekyll Island Revitalization Group, one of two companies that lost the bid for the partnership role, to stop the project. It had contended the contract was awarded unfairly, but a judge Monday dismissed its claim.
Several legislator members of the Jekyll Island Legislative Oversight Committee, which met prior to the board's meeting, stayed to hear an update of Linger Longer's plans.
House Majority Leader Jerry Keen, R-St. Simons Island, who chairs the legislative committee, praised the authority on behalf of the oversight panel for its efforts.
"From our standpoint, we would like to thank the authority for all their hard work on this project," Keen said. "They are doing things now that will be beneficial to not only coastal Georgia, but all of Georgia, as a whole."
Not everyone spoke in support of the project.
"Actually, what they said today was just a rehashing of their initial proposal, which indicates to me that they are not willing to change anything," said Frank Mirasola, president of the Jekyll Island Citizens Association, which opposes the current plan.
"We still have the same concerns after hearing their presentation that we had before the meeting (Tuesday). We support the restoration and rebuilding of the existing hotels that are there now within the same footprint that they exist in today."
Other organizations opposed to the project as proposed also sent representatives, including the Initiative to Protect Jekyll Island and the Center for a Sustainable Coast.
Jim Langford, project executive director for Linger Longer Communities, re-sponded to criticism, saying that issues such as affordability, parking and beach access are all addressed in the plan.
He said 72 percent of all new accommodations will cost less than $139 per night and that parking is being restructured, not eliminated.
"Some new spaces will be located closer to the beach than any parking that exists today and will eliminate the current competition between day visitors and conventions," Langford said.
He also said there will be 8,500 feet of new pervious boardwalk.
"There will be the same number and locations of beach access points as exist today," he said. "There will be improved restroom and changing facilities. And there will be no affect on beach access elsewhere on the island.
"We have three main goals. One, create a critical mass of new and compelling reasons for visitors to come back to the island without doing too much.
"Two, achieve the right balance of economic sustainability with minimal impact on Jekyll Island's cultural and environmental resources.
"And three, to provide a recreational experience that is enjoyable and affordable for all Georgians."
Langford said the company, which is collecting public input, hopes to begin construction in about a year.
Section(s) Local News
By BRANDEE THOMAS
The Brunswick News
ATLANTA - Calling Jekyll Island a "tarnished jewel," the chair of the Glynn County Commission told overseers of the state park Tuesday that the commission is backing efforts to revitalize it.
"The Glynn County Commission would like to endorse what the (Jekyll Island) Authority is doing," Commission Chair Don Hogan told the authority during its meeting at the Coverdell Legislative Building.
"Jekyll Island is a tarnished jewel for the state of Georgia and it's time that jewel was polished," Hogan said.
Hogan was among 75 community leaders and citizens from Glynn County who attended the meeting of the Jekyll Island Authority board to show support for redevelopment plans. Others made the trip to oppose them.
The Jekyll Island board this past autumn approved a $440 million project outlined by Linger Longer Communities of Greensboro, N.C., to construct new hotels, condominiums, convention center and shopping area on about 60 acres near the waterfront. Linger Longer is the authority's private sector partner in the redevelopment.
Support for the project came from representatives of both the public and private sectors Tuesday.
"Linger Longer has done a great job," said Bruce Dixon, chair of the Brunswick-Golden Isles Chamber of Commerce. "We all want to do our part to protect the environment and this is a great marriage between (the private sector) and the state."
The meeting came just one day after a Fulton County Superior Court judge denied a request by Jekyll Island Revitalization Group, one of two companies that lost the bid for the partnership role, to stop the project. It had contended the contract was awarded unfairly, but a judge Monday dismissed its claim.
Several legislator members of the Jekyll Island Legislative Oversight Committee, which met prior to the board's meeting, stayed to hear an update of Linger Longer's plans.
House Majority Leader Jerry Keen, R-St. Simons Island, who chairs the legislative committee, praised the authority on behalf of the oversight panel for its efforts.
"From our standpoint, we would like to thank the authority for all their hard work on this project," Keen said. "They are doing things now that will be beneficial to not only coastal Georgia, but all of Georgia, as a whole."
Not everyone spoke in support of the project.
"Actually, what they said today was just a rehashing of their initial proposal, which indicates to me that they are not willing to change anything," said Frank Mirasola, president of the Jekyll Island Citizens Association, which opposes the current plan.
"We still have the same concerns after hearing their presentation that we had before the meeting (Tuesday). We support the restoration and rebuilding of the existing hotels that are there now within the same footprint that they exist in today."
Other organizations opposed to the project as proposed also sent representatives, including the Initiative to Protect Jekyll Island and the Center for a Sustainable Coast.
Jim Langford, project executive director for Linger Longer Communities, re-sponded to criticism, saying that issues such as affordability, parking and beach access are all addressed in the plan.
He said 72 percent of all new accommodations will cost less than $139 per night and that parking is being restructured, not eliminated.
"Some new spaces will be located closer to the beach than any parking that exists today and will eliminate the current competition between day visitors and conventions," Langford said.
He also said there will be 8,500 feet of new pervious boardwalk.
"There will be the same number and locations of beach access points as exist today," he said. "There will be improved restroom and changing facilities. And there will be no affect on beach access elsewhere on the island.
"We have three main goals. One, create a critical mass of new and compelling reasons for visitors to come back to the island without doing too much.
"Two, achieve the right balance of economic sustainability with minimal impact on Jekyll Island's cultural and environmental resources.
"And three, to provide a recreational experience that is enjoyable and affordable for all Georgians."
Langford said the company, which is collecting public input, hopes to begin construction in about a year.
01/16 - Public wants to revitalize
Date January 16, 2008
Section(s) Letters
The Brunswick News
Linger Longer has found fault with my resolution calling for the preservation of public access to Jekyll Island's main beach. The Brunswick News has requested that I reassess my position. In criticizing the resolution and defending Linger Longer's proposed oceanfront Jekyll village, they have missed the point. To say I oppose needed revitalization is totally false. What I am opposed to is massive new development, especially any more development on the beach, which is also opposed by most Georgians.
If the public, especially the people I represent, had not expressed their concerns to me, I would have no reason to take a hard look at current plans. Like most people, I appreciate a good business vision. However, a State Park with prime beach front that belongs to all Georgians begs scrutiny. Those wanting a town center and condos on Jekyll appear connected to a limited portion of the business community. The general public has convinced me this is not what they want. The public has not called for extensive redevelopment, only for revitalization.
If Linger Longer is determined to provide a "commercial hub" in a State Park, does the Jekyll Island Authority have to locate it on the beach? The overwhelming responses I receive daily are let's rebuild and revitalize existing facilities, stop the building of private condos, and keep Jekyll's only remaining open beach, unblocked by hotels and private homes, preserved in its natural beauty. I think the people are right. Visit www.jeffchapman.us for the full story.
Senator Jeff Chapman
Brunswick
County needs to rethink recycling provider
I read with great interest your article about recycling in the Dec. 28 edition of The Brunswick News. Let me share my perspective.
I am a strong advocate of recycling. This week, however, with very strong regret I canceled our recycling service.
Since the county renegotiated the contract with Southland Waste, the company has failed to pick up our recycled materials on the scheduled pickup day more often than not.
Recently, Southland once again failed to pick up the recyclables on the scheduled day. Two days later, I contacted Glynn County Customer Service to file a report. As I was taking the containers back out to the curb, the Southland Waste truck drove up. In a nasty tone of voice the driver told me I was only supposed to have one container. In other words, do not recycle too much!
I have two recycling containers, as I have an old container that I used when we paid extra for recycling during a previous county administration. That was during the time those of us who paid extra for recycling later learned all of this material was going directly to the landfill along with the other trash. The county and Southland continued to accept these "extra" payments as if the material was being recycled. I paid for that extra container many times over.
Contrary to the recent article, it is obvious to me that Southland is not really interested in providing recycling service to Glynn County residents. If they were, they would provide as many containers as citizens need to hold recycled items. One container is not enough even for our two person household. Given this attitude as well as the many times I have had to call to report trash flying out of Southland Waste trucks traveling across the causeway, I strongly suggest Glynn County terminate the contract with Southland and find an ecologically minded company interested in providing reliable service to our citizens.
Duane Harris
St. Simons Island
Separate billing gives customers new options
I recently received my much-heralded first billing for "Sanitation Services" from the City of Brunswick, a byproduct of the separation of trash collection from the costs of the provision of water and sewer services by the new Joint Water and Sewer Commission.
With the revised billing arrangement, I would like to put the City Administrators on notice that a new reality could be dawning as a result of this reorganization - something which they are probably not prepared to address without some additional effort on the part of themselves and their employees.
In short, this new separate billing will give Brunswick's "Sanitation Service" customers the ability to challenge the quality of their services (or the lack thereof) without the risk of also having their water service terminated for non-payment.
I, personally, will be exercising this option when paying my future "Sanitary Service" invoices, and as of this week I will be deducting $3.30 from my $16.50 January invoice because the household refuse at my Wolfe Street rental property did not get picked up last week.
The "Sanitary Service" collection at this vacant property, currently being renovated, has been missed at least a half dozen times since I began paying for the service last June. In addition, the small weekly piles of lawn debris which I place curbside have been ignored more than half of the time.
Is it unreasonable to demand that otherwise well intended measures by government to force citizens' compliance with common sense issues also meet the same standards of service expected from private industry? I think not.
Virgil Rogers
St. Simons Island
City oversteps bounds with yard requirements
Here we go, with the city putting into law ways to control what we can do with our property.
Some time ago the city fathers decided we did not know how to take care of our property, so they set up a historic district, and everyone in the district had to ask the city what they could do and how their private property had to look. When someone wanted to remodel and upgrade to more efficient windows, doors, or even siding, it had to be approved by the city panel. To build a building, it had to look a certain way.
If the city fathers want to maintain a historic look, they need to remember that history is ongoing to the moment we are in, and it can't be restricted by a group of people. I think what I do with my property should reflect what I want. Seems that's part of the Constitution. Establishing a historic district has caused people with limited resources heartache and money.
Now the city comes with a new idea. Let's tell people what they can have in their yards. Again I think this is unconstitutional. I believe what is in my yard is mine. Why the city thinks it should be able to tell me what I can have in my yard and what I can do with it is unknown. The commission has decided to tell us what cars we can have in our yards, or for how long, before we owe them a fee for having our car in our yard (I pay taxes to the state and county for my car).
Many people in this town have had a car in their yard that has been or is being worked on. Some of us just like cars and buy certain cars to repair and drive. Some just don't have the time or money to fix a ride when it breaks so we get along without it and fix it when we can. Maybe no one on the commission has ever been short of cash, but a lot of us have, and we deal with cars as we can. The city of Brunswick is not a "Cadillac town." It has always been a "Chevy town." We work at the mill or a construction site.
Frederick J. Dufel
Brunswick
Jekyll Island project is too close to the beach
My comments and then a solution to the Jekyll Island problem are this. I think the whole project is just too close to the beach, and they do not allow traffic to drive straight through next to the beach. You have to go about two miles around to get to the other side. That to me takes away the beauty and enjoyment of a lovely scenic drive next to the beach.
I saw the maps of the project and it shows that as soon as you get on Jekyll Island that all you see now is a detour to the right or left to go around the project and a bunch of buildings and trees everywhere.
This to me is just one step closer to being just like Sea Island, where now they have guard gates and no public is free to come in.
That to me is taking away the freedom of the public access and giving it to the rich. That is wrong, and Jekyll Island can become just like this too one day.
My solution to Jekyll Island is this. I think that there should be a two-way street, with palm trees in the middle, straight to the beach and parking on both sides at an angle. Then I think there should be a two way street next to the beach all the way through the project, with palm trees in the middle, and have parking at an angle on both sides. Then there can be plenty of access parking, and if you want to just drive and see the beautiful beach, you can.
In other words, I think their whole project should be back away from the beach about 40 yards or 120 feet and allow the access of the public to have their freedom to the beach still without pushing back their project too far from the beach also. This will be great for everyone's enjoyment and freedom of public access close to the beach.
Wayne Rhodes
Brunswick
Linger Longer Web site limits public opinions
As a concerned citizen of Jekyll Island, I read with some amusement and distaste Jim Langford's column in The Brunswick News.
I then accessed their Web site to vote NO on their resolution. To my surprise the only possible vote was YES. I believe that the former Soviet Union conducted polls in this manner and that Linger Longer is equally single minded. I have posted several other questions to their Web site following their public input session and have not received any response from them.
I think they really are not interested in any opinions that do not support their proposal as is.
Chuck Diefenderfer
Jekyll Island
Editors note: See other letters on Jekyll Island on our Web site at www.thebrunswicknews.com.
Section(s) Letters
The Brunswick News
Linger Longer has found fault with my resolution calling for the preservation of public access to Jekyll Island's main beach. The Brunswick News has requested that I reassess my position. In criticizing the resolution and defending Linger Longer's proposed oceanfront Jekyll village, they have missed the point. To say I oppose needed revitalization is totally false. What I am opposed to is massive new development, especially any more development on the beach, which is also opposed by most Georgians.
If the public, especially the people I represent, had not expressed their concerns to me, I would have no reason to take a hard look at current plans. Like most people, I appreciate a good business vision. However, a State Park with prime beach front that belongs to all Georgians begs scrutiny. Those wanting a town center and condos on Jekyll appear connected to a limited portion of the business community. The general public has convinced me this is not what they want. The public has not called for extensive redevelopment, only for revitalization.
If Linger Longer is determined to provide a "commercial hub" in a State Park, does the Jekyll Island Authority have to locate it on the beach? The overwhelming responses I receive daily are let's rebuild and revitalize existing facilities, stop the building of private condos, and keep Jekyll's only remaining open beach, unblocked by hotels and private homes, preserved in its natural beauty. I think the people are right. Visit www.jeffchapman.us for the full story.
Senator Jeff Chapman
Brunswick
County needs to rethink recycling provider
I read with great interest your article about recycling in the Dec. 28 edition of The Brunswick News. Let me share my perspective.
I am a strong advocate of recycling. This week, however, with very strong regret I canceled our recycling service.
Since the county renegotiated the contract with Southland Waste, the company has failed to pick up our recycled materials on the scheduled pickup day more often than not.
Recently, Southland once again failed to pick up the recyclables on the scheduled day. Two days later, I contacted Glynn County Customer Service to file a report. As I was taking the containers back out to the curb, the Southland Waste truck drove up. In a nasty tone of voice the driver told me I was only supposed to have one container. In other words, do not recycle too much!
I have two recycling containers, as I have an old container that I used when we paid extra for recycling during a previous county administration. That was during the time those of us who paid extra for recycling later learned all of this material was going directly to the landfill along with the other trash. The county and Southland continued to accept these "extra" payments as if the material was being recycled. I paid for that extra container many times over.
Contrary to the recent article, it is obvious to me that Southland is not really interested in providing recycling service to Glynn County residents. If they were, they would provide as many containers as citizens need to hold recycled items. One container is not enough even for our two person household. Given this attitude as well as the many times I have had to call to report trash flying out of Southland Waste trucks traveling across the causeway, I strongly suggest Glynn County terminate the contract with Southland and find an ecologically minded company interested in providing reliable service to our citizens.
Duane Harris
St. Simons Island
Separate billing gives customers new options
I recently received my much-heralded first billing for "Sanitation Services" from the City of Brunswick, a byproduct of the separation of trash collection from the costs of the provision of water and sewer services by the new Joint Water and Sewer Commission.
With the revised billing arrangement, I would like to put the City Administrators on notice that a new reality could be dawning as a result of this reorganization - something which they are probably not prepared to address without some additional effort on the part of themselves and their employees.
In short, this new separate billing will give Brunswick's "Sanitation Service" customers the ability to challenge the quality of their services (or the lack thereof) without the risk of also having their water service terminated for non-payment.
I, personally, will be exercising this option when paying my future "Sanitary Service" invoices, and as of this week I will be deducting $3.30 from my $16.50 January invoice because the household refuse at my Wolfe Street rental property did not get picked up last week.
The "Sanitary Service" collection at this vacant property, currently being renovated, has been missed at least a half dozen times since I began paying for the service last June. In addition, the small weekly piles of lawn debris which I place curbside have been ignored more than half of the time.
Is it unreasonable to demand that otherwise well intended measures by government to force citizens' compliance with common sense issues also meet the same standards of service expected from private industry? I think not.
Virgil Rogers
St. Simons Island
City oversteps bounds with yard requirements
Here we go, with the city putting into law ways to control what we can do with our property.
Some time ago the city fathers decided we did not know how to take care of our property, so they set up a historic district, and everyone in the district had to ask the city what they could do and how their private property had to look. When someone wanted to remodel and upgrade to more efficient windows, doors, or even siding, it had to be approved by the city panel. To build a building, it had to look a certain way.
If the city fathers want to maintain a historic look, they need to remember that history is ongoing to the moment we are in, and it can't be restricted by a group of people. I think what I do with my property should reflect what I want. Seems that's part of the Constitution. Establishing a historic district has caused people with limited resources heartache and money.
Now the city comes with a new idea. Let's tell people what they can have in their yards. Again I think this is unconstitutional. I believe what is in my yard is mine. Why the city thinks it should be able to tell me what I can have in my yard and what I can do with it is unknown. The commission has decided to tell us what cars we can have in our yards, or for how long, before we owe them a fee for having our car in our yard (I pay taxes to the state and county for my car).
Many people in this town have had a car in their yard that has been or is being worked on. Some of us just like cars and buy certain cars to repair and drive. Some just don't have the time or money to fix a ride when it breaks so we get along without it and fix it when we can. Maybe no one on the commission has ever been short of cash, but a lot of us have, and we deal with cars as we can. The city of Brunswick is not a "Cadillac town." It has always been a "Chevy town." We work at the mill or a construction site.
Frederick J. Dufel
Brunswick
Jekyll Island project is too close to the beach
My comments and then a solution to the Jekyll Island problem are this. I think the whole project is just too close to the beach, and they do not allow traffic to drive straight through next to the beach. You have to go about two miles around to get to the other side. That to me takes away the beauty and enjoyment of a lovely scenic drive next to the beach.
I saw the maps of the project and it shows that as soon as you get on Jekyll Island that all you see now is a detour to the right or left to go around the project and a bunch of buildings and trees everywhere.
This to me is just one step closer to being just like Sea Island, where now they have guard gates and no public is free to come in.
That to me is taking away the freedom of the public access and giving it to the rich. That is wrong, and Jekyll Island can become just like this too one day.
My solution to Jekyll Island is this. I think that there should be a two-way street, with palm trees in the middle, straight to the beach and parking on both sides at an angle. Then I think there should be a two way street next to the beach all the way through the project, with palm trees in the middle, and have parking at an angle on both sides. Then there can be plenty of access parking, and if you want to just drive and see the beautiful beach, you can.
In other words, I think their whole project should be back away from the beach about 40 yards or 120 feet and allow the access of the public to have their freedom to the beach still without pushing back their project too far from the beach also. This will be great for everyone's enjoyment and freedom of public access close to the beach.
Wayne Rhodes
Brunswick
Linger Longer Web site limits public opinions
As a concerned citizen of Jekyll Island, I read with some amusement and distaste Jim Langford's column in The Brunswick News.
I then accessed their Web site to vote NO on their resolution. To my surprise the only possible vote was YES. I believe that the former Soviet Union conducted polls in this manner and that Linger Longer is equally single minded. I have posted several other questions to their Web site following their public input session and have not received any response from them.
I think they really are not interested in any opinions that do not support their proposal as is.
Chuck Diefenderfer
Jekyll Island
Editors note: See other letters on Jekyll Island on our Web site at www.thebrunswicknews.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)